Subject: New Permission Givers?
Author:
Posted on: 2015-01-20 09:21:00 UTC
Do we need and/or want some?
On the one hand, while we have a pretty large number of PGs still in the PPC, very few of us are active on the Board. The last five or so Permission requests have all been answered by me (I think), for instance. And we've all had the position a fairly long time, and been around for even longer - the 'youngest' PG is Phobos, and hands up if you remember him joining. (The hands are rhetorical)
But on the other hand, there aren't many Permission Requests at the moment; I can easily stay on top of them by myself if I need to, and I know Nesh and Phobos at least will jump in if they see a need. And since the only role PGs have is granting Permission, it's not like we need an excess, or have a quota, or anything. We're not leaders or moderators, it's not a reward or mark of honour - it's a job that, right now, doesn't really need many people in it.
So I'm pretty much on the fence as to whether it's desirable/necessary to vote in more. What do you think? Feel free to debate/argue/anything. Hopefully a vague community consensus will emerge as to what we should do/not do.
And to save space and time, if you think we do need new PGs, go ahead and nominate. Nominees should have been an active member of the PPC community for the last six months minimum, and should have Permission themselves. No self-nominations, please; and if you get nominated, please either accept or refuse the nomination. (And this isn't the place for voting; that'll be a later thread, if it turns out the community wants to go ahead with it)
hS