Subject: If I might add my own thoughts?
Author:
Posted on: 2016-06-25 22:09:00 UTC
First off, allow us to humbly apologize for my lateness. The roads leading to Borrd have been particularly hellish this year. Something in the weather, perhaps, that clouds peoples' minds. Not to mention wandering herds of Green Ads.
But never mind that. We must address the matter at hand. While we do agree with Baron Phobos on the responsibilities of stewardship, we found his proposal to be… inequitable. One baron nearly doubles his stead, while three barons must be satisfied with dividing up a comparatively small portion of land? The very notion is laughable.
However, since the barons involved have not spoken out or are not present, that rather muddies the potentiality for claims and counterclaims. Baron Thanasius Ampelius has asked for the land (or someone pretending to be him has), but we can hardly see how any baron can properly govern with several other polities in the way.
That being said, we would support the border restructuring plan put forward by Baron Phobos—with one alteration. The land currently under discussion that lies within the Barony of Araeph should be divided between Barons Phobos and July as they see fit.
Better the opportunity for fairness than not.
—Baron PC, the Poor Cynick
Ludum bonum, non revertens
((Please excuse my Google Latin motto. If you can figure it out, more power to you. Also, Baron PC can be a little bit of a gadfly.))