Subject: Hmm
Author:
Posted on: 2016-03-10 15:50:00 UTC

Ok but. When I say 'they wouldn't have printed anything about newspapers' I meant that the mercantile and poltiical papers wouldn't have, except for possibly accusing Alexander Hamilton of being a witch. Sure, there could be gossip rags claiming that a stick the author had seen looked magic, but again. People could write pamphlets about ANYTHING. There was no obligation to the truth. Also, 'a few papers had taken him seriously enough to print pictures' is... Well. Newspapers with regular circulation did not really work like that, at least the ones with enough cash behind them to print pictures. And again! Pictures were a RARE thing for the deaths of leaders of states and such.

I mean, I only skimmed over my book on the history of newspapers in America, but I still do not think that they existed in any way that would make this make sense. Not in the 1790s.

Reply Return to messages