Subject: Things we've learned, part 2.
Author:
Posted on: 2016-03-09 14:24:00 UTC

-Ilvermorny dates to somewhere in the early 1600s, but started off small. Still no indication of where exactly it is, or where it got the name. It seems that it was not a native institution, though, so the name is probably from a European language.

-The question 'how did real magic users get caught up in witch trials?' is answered with 'magical witchcatchers'. Fairly logical, that.

-The New World magical community seems to have cut itself off from the Old. Whereas before the Natives were in vague contact with Europe and Africa, now the running-from-authority Euromericans may have damped down on that communication.

-Magical plants are different in the New World. That means different potions, and probably (once they got round to it) different woods for wands.

-There are few to no Pureblood families in the Americas, and so no racism around that. That's really interesting, given the vast historical problem the US has with the other sort of racism. I guess JKR was correlating Purebloods with the aristocracy here? Speculation: skin-colour racism was alive and well in the American magical community, probably justified as 'African wizards should just Apparate back to Africa where they belong'.

-MACUSA has changed its name at least once. In the 1690s, it would have been 'United Colonies' if anything, but probably just 'North American Colonies'. The term 'u/United States' is a political coinage from much later. I'm dubious about 'Congress', too - the term seems to have originally meant a single meeting, not an ongoing thing. I'd imagine they changed from ??Magical Parliament of the North American Colonies to MACUSA during the War of Independence.

-Americans are harder to trick about magic than Europeans. This sort of feels like it might be a snide comment on something, but I have no idea what.

hS

Reply Return to messages