Subject: It also explains...
Author:
Posted on: 2015-11-05 11:23:00 UTC

... why Palpatine was so appallingly bad at choosing apprentices.

I mean, really: the purpose of the Sith Apprentice, under the Rule of Two, is to eventually surpass her* master and become the new Master, maintaining the secret and continuing to increase Sith dominance of the galaxy.

(*Darth Zannah finds your assumption that the Apprentice should be male hilarious. Also you just got lightsaber'd.)

Palpy was a good choice for this - he's a politician, so he can sneak in Sith agendas without anyone noticing. (In the books, Plagueis was a high-profile banker, his master Tenebrous was a famous starship designer, his master seems to have been a prominent scientist... you get the picture). But his apprentices? From the films:

-Darth Maul, a brutal fighter with no sense of subtlety. He's outright eager to reveal the secret the Sith have kept for a millennium.
-Count Dooku, a known fallen Jedi. 'The evil Force user we didn't know about was actually the evil Force user we did know about? How did this happen?!' Yeah, no.
-Anakin 'emotionally-crippled half-cyborg' Skywalker. Admittedly by that time Sidious had decided to become immortal and skip the whole 'decent apprentice' thing, but still!

The books explain Maul as being an illicit 'apprentice' while Plagueis was still alive, but that still doesn't explain Dooku. Palpatine never takes - or even seems to look for - a decent Apprentice, just a series of tools and weapons. The idea that this is because there are already two Sith in play - one a prominent politician on his way to becoming Supreme Chancellor, the other a friend of the Jedi, famous general, and member of the opposition in the Senate (inasmuch as they have one, Padme's group is in it)... yep, that works.

The only question (and one which the theory doesn't actually answer) is the one Yoda and Mace consider at the end of TPM: which one is the Master, and which the Apprentice?

hS

Reply Return to messages