"Immortal" here is the name of the species.

Subject: "Immortal" here is the name of the species.
Author: Iximaz
Posted on: 2015-09-03 18:58:00 UTC

For lack of a better term. Notice the difference between capital-I Immortal versus just 'immortal'.

Anyway, considering how things worked in the movie, I'd be inclined to say yes. Which could be a Very Bad Thing. :P I'd say if an Immortal agent had to go up against an Immortal Sue, they'd have to let their partner do the killing lest they become a Sue themself. ~~After all, there can be only one~~

Reply Return to messages

Jump to this post's position in the thread ↴

So I was watching Highlander 'cause 90's awesomeness... by Mister Shoebox on 2015-09-03 18:47:00 UTC Reply

When a thought occurred to me:

Those familiar with Highlander knows that when an Immortal kills another Immortal, they gain the other Immortal's skills, knowledge, whatever, via process called a "Quickening."

So my thought is this: If an Immortal Agent took out an Immortal Sue or Stu, would they gain the MarySue...ness of their target? (MarySueishness? MarySue Attributes?)

What do you think, dudes?

I'm gonna go with 'no'.... by Matt Cipher on 2015-09-03 18:53:00 UTC Reply

Unless the Agent AND the Sue are both from the Highlander continuum (apologies, I know nothing about it), then we may debate.

But, as for the others - no. Take my first mission, as an example (Thread below). William is an immortal warlock and Azriel was an immortal Sue. Nothing happened between them.

"Immortal" here is the name of the species. by Iximaz on 2015-09-03 18:58:00 UTC Reply

For lack of a better term. Notice the difference between capital-I Immortal versus just 'immortal'.

Anyway, considering how things worked in the movie, I'd be inclined to say yes. Which could be a Very Bad Thing. :P I'd say if an Immortal agent had to go up against an Immortal Sue, they'd have to let their partner do the killing lest they become a Sue themself. ~~After all, there can be only one~~

Okay, cancel my previous outburst of stupidity... =__= (nm) by Matt Cipher on 2015-09-03 19:01:00 UTC Reply