Subject: Ey, that seems pretty good. (nm)
Author:
Posted on: 2017-06-04 22:32:00 UTC
-
Regarding Tomash's banning: by
on 2017-06-04 19:03:00 UTC
Reply
As Tomash pointed out when he announced his ban, while the idea of his temporary ban was favored, there was never any consensus on the actual length. Tomash himself called it a ban for “2-3 months” in the above post. The reason I’m bringing this up is because we’re approaching the mid-point of two to three months; in fact, this coming Tuesday, the sixth of June, will be the “seventy-five days" rough halfway point since Tomash left.
So, is that date an all right time for Tomash to return to the community? Does anyone have any particular objections to that date, or reasons he should wait longer?
—doctorlit, administrating -
Since it was more of a self-imposed exile... by
on 2017-06-06 04:24:00 UTC
Reply
In my opinion, he can come back whenever he wants. I'm more or less in line with Phobos.
-
No problems here. (nm) by
on 2017-06-05 23:00:00 UTC
Reply
-
As far as I'm concerned... by
on 2017-06-05 14:39:00 UTC
Reply
Tomash was never banned. There wasn't a strong enough consensus. It was a self-imposed exile, which he could have ended at any time.
So, if he wants to come back, he can come back.
-Phobos -
Fine by me. (nm) by
on 2017-06-05 02:07:00 UTC
Reply
-
Ey, that seems pretty good. (nm) by
on 2017-06-04 22:32:00 UTC
Reply
-
I'm in favour, aye. (nm) by
on 2017-06-04 21:14:00 UTC
Reply
-
No objections whatsoever! (nm) by
on 2017-06-04 21:07:00 UTC
Reply
-
Yeah! He can come back! (nm) by
on 2017-06-04 20:05:00 UTC
Reply
-
Fine by me (nm) by
on 2017-06-04 19:57:00 UTC
Reply
-
I'm fine by that. (nm) by
on 2017-06-04 19:56:00 UTC
Reply
-
A bit of clarification, because I can't read. by
on 2017-06-04 19:55:00 UTC
Reply
When you say, we're approaching the mid-point of two to three months, you mean we are currently in the period of thirty-forty-five days, correct?
And honestly, I would be perfectly fine if the ban were to be set to two months, and he was allowed to return after sixty days had passed, but failing that, I see no issues with seventy-five days. -
Clarification, I hope. by
on 2017-06-04 21:15:00 UTC
Reply
Um, I'm not sure what you mean by "the period of thirty-forty-five days." We're at roughly two months and two weeks since Tomash's ban started, with today the seventy-third day of the ban, and Tuesday the seventy-fifth. Counting a month as thirty days, that makes day seventy-five the equivalent of two-and-a-half months, the average of a "two- to three-month ban."
Have I helped?
—doctorlit wishes months were all the same length