Subject: What I think the consensus on missionability is
Author:
Posted on: 2017-03-02 20:17:00 UTC

So, there are good fics (there's obviously a pile of subcategories here, but there's no point in going in to them), which are obviously not missionable. Then, moving a few steps down the quality ladder (which is not a very strict ladder and is sort of fuzzy), you hit the fics that have a few issues (maybe they need a bit of copy editing, or there's some shades of OOCness) but are otherwise decent. These "mehfics" are more or less not mission material either. Like you could in theory do a mission to them if you really wanted to, but you shouldn't because they're not really all that bad.

Past the various shades of meh (which really isn't all that accurately named, since it spans from "just fix this one small thing and your story will be very good" to "this is not-good") you'll find straight badfic, where some combination of (among other possible problems) "that's not at all canon-like!" and "that's not how writing works!" makes the fic bad enough to mission.

The line between meh and bad is really fuzzy in a whole lot of cases. I have the impression that, if you're wandering up to the borders of missionability (for any reason) with a fic, you're expected either to not mission that fic or to be very careful about it so you don't give the impression of crossing a line. (Additionally, there's a political element to this, in that if you're taking that sort of risk, you need the community to trust you to do that.) A clear example of this way of thinking about things is the Despatch thread from a while back, where we decided "we would prefer not to write Despatch because that's straying too close to RPF", but doc's Despatch-style mission was far enough from objectionable and carefully done enough to avoid any complaints.

The above is my attempt at explaining why people (and probably me) tend to be conservative about picking fic to mission.

Ignoring all the general commentary, i think that, given the level of potential uncertainty about the source fic's badness (you and Ix both remarked on it) how you chose to do the mission was reasonable and appropriate. I also think that (and I'm going off of the mission) warping characters so you can fit them into the canon plot is certainly not a good thing, and the plagiarism puts the fic well into missionable.

I liked the non-standard exorcism method (I remember someone writing up a whole series of those ages back, and I've been wondering if anyone would run with them), and that's not just because Young Wizards is good stuff.

I enjoyed the agent interactions, and I think they made the mission fun to read. (That includes the bit where things get serious for a moment with Semele not liking being crowded.)

The only "complaint" (and this is more my fault for not being up to date on Driftwood) is that I couldn't get a good mental picture of the "watch-the-DVD" section of the mission.

- Tomash, who put general potentially-useless rambling about community norms and mission concrit in one post for no reason

Reply Return to messages