Subject: (Sorry for long response time.)
Author:
Posted on: 2013-07-08 05:26:00 UTC

I think, perhaps, I got carried away with posting this so early . . . it relies a bit too much on things that have yet to happen in my spin-off, so your confusion is entirely justified. All the same, I'm glad it at least worked as a standalone scare.

I will say that the thing in Vania's dream is very much not Paul, which I did try to state pretty clearly. ("You're not Paul!" . . . the something wearing Paul’s face.) What it actually was will have to wait, but there are a couple of hints in here.

I intentionally kept Vania's emotion here ambiguous as well, because thanks to her missing memories, neither she nor the audience actually know what happened during the last Mary Sue invasion. Of course, she obviously remembered for a moment here, but again--I'm not telling yet.

"Think vines." Alas that I must edit them out. They sound useful. I actually thought "bleen bag chair" was too easy of a joke, and decided to not spell it out directly and let the reader fill it in. (Which you did. Yay!) I know the Luxury line is kind of Family Guyish, but . . . I rather like it. I think I'll keep it in for now. (Who knows how sound and walls might interact in a dream?)

The looking backwards bit . . . might depend on how one typically uses bean bags? It literally just occurred to me that most people might sit in a bean bag chair, as though it has "chair" in its name or something, whereas I've always used them as a pillow while laying down. Yeah, now I see how Vania tilting her head backwards to see the room upside down was unintentionally horrifying. What if I try:

*adding to the first sentence: Vania jolted awake at a sudden sound, throwing her ponytail into her face as she lifted her head out of the bleen bag chair. She had fallen asleep lying on the floor, with the bean bag as a pillow.

* And at the scene itself: “Doc?” Vania used her feet to slide backwards into the bean bag, tilting her head upwards to see the rest of RC251 upside-down.

Would that read a bit more clearly?

Reply Return to messages