Subject: Politics? But of course.
Author:
Posted on: 2012-11-10 23:44:00 UTC
Well, you hear a lot where I live about accidental shootings, and it's always because a) some dumb kid found the loaded gun, either at home or when on a hunting trip with the family, and played around with it, or b) people went out to their hunting cabins, got drunk, and had an accident. Then again, I live in Wisconsin, which is known for beer and guns, apparently.
I think the general idea of the restrictions is to make it so that it would be harder for criminals to get guns in the first place. I support the measures for having full background checks and enforcing safety training, just because it might mean people like the sikh temple shooter would have a harder time obtaining weapons. (For the record, I do believe that if he hadn't already owned a gun, he wouldn't have started on his rampage, because he wouldn't have had anything to do it with.)
I agree that ownership for people who want to hunt and things like that shouldn't be a problem, but it's too easy for people like repeat felons to get one currently. IMHO, of course.