Subject: (( In general... ))
Author:
Posted on: 2013-08-13 22:47:00 UTC

Permission is not required for RPs, since their canonicity is considered dubious by default. Plus, RP is a great way to develop new characters, so we don't want to deny people the opportunity to do so pre-Permission. However, if the RP's creator (in this case, SeaTurtle) wants to have a strictly canonical, Permission-only kind of RP, they can do that. We'll have to wait and see what SeaTurtle says about it.

I think established NPCs are off-limits either way, though, since developing them would constitute adding to PPC canon. That's just my instinct, though; I'm not sure how that's been handled historically.

Yeah, the treasure hunt RP was unfortunate. I actually would have had to drop out in any case, since I had a meeting that weekend, but I'd hoped things would happen before I left, and I could've written my characters a graceful exit, perhaps to make a glorious comeback later. Somebody (preferably the person who started the game) really has to take charge and run things in a an event-driven situation like that, or we get exactly what we got: everyone has a different idea about what should be happening, and therefore nothing does. Rails are good!

~Neshomeh

Reply Return to messages