Subject: Haha, I can understand that.
Author:
Posted on: 2022-01-21 15:39:51 UTC

I'm gray-ace myself. {= ) I think the relationships in the musical don't bug me, though, because the one with Emma (Jekyll's fiancee) is a pretty decent one, with respect and support between them and not just sap; and the thing with Hyde and Lucy is 100% as messed up and horrible as it should be. And I imagine there was probably pressure to have female roles in the show, which is a good thing! Though I will say Emma is fairly useless as a character, IIRC; she doesn't actively move the plot, she's just kinda there until they drop the bridge on her. So she could have been done better. Lucy feels much more like a real person to me, and her crush on Jekyll at least serves to show him being a good person and loyal fiance to Emma.

I gotta say musical!Jekyll is generally less of a selfish coward than book!Jekyll, too. Musical!Jekyll is a bit of a wet blanket, but at least he's out to help his gravely mentally ill father; book!Jekyll just wanted to have his party cake and eat it, too, without losing his respectable image. So, yeah, I like musical!Jekyll better and I'm not sorry. {; P I daresay if Hyde is less evil in the musical, it's because Jekyll is more good—and, lest we forget, Hyde is Jekyll, and Jekyll is Hyde. {= )

~Neshomeh