Subject: I don't know that any of them do.
Author:
Posted on: 2025-01-28 00:04:21 UTC
And, frankly, you don't need to shoehorn a relationship in just to have one.
--Ls, agreeing with Nesh and Lily
-
Advice needed: who should I pair Helena with? by
on 2025-01-27 05:08:30 UTC
Edited
Writing
Reply
I impose a personal rule that any and every female character that I'm currently writing must, without exception, eventually have a permanent love interest. However, I'm very stuck on who should be coupled up with Helena, and I don't plan on creating an entirely new character as a love interest for her. Boarders who have read the Fairy Godfathers spin-off, who do you think has the most romantic chemistry with her?
-
On the topic of checking in with the comm on my writing, by
on 2025-01-28 02:56:51 UTC
Edited
Reply
Expand this post →
-
Yeah, I don’t see any problems with this. (nm) by
on 2025-01-28 11:24:17 UTC
Reply
-
I don't know that any of them do. by
on 2025-01-28 00:04:21 UTC
Reply
And, frankly, you don't need to shoehorn a relationship in just to have one.
--Ls, agreeing with Nesh and Lily
-
Er, why is that a rule for you? by
on 2025-01-27 15:37:47 UTC
Reply
And why only for female characters?
~Neshomeh
-
It's because female characters tend to get the short end of the stick when it comes to romance, by
on 2025-01-27 15:45:21 UTC
Reply
especially in fanfic, so I impose this rule as a kind of protest.
-
Right, but there's no need to shoehorn things in. by
on 2025-01-27 16:02:25 UTC
Reply
Characters develop relationships organically as you continue writing them into situations. I know I didn't start out intending to put my Agents together; they just kinda fell into it after a while. And amatonormativity--the preference for romantic love uber alles, and how everyone's expected to fall in romantic love and place romantic relationships above all others--is equally worth "protesting", especially in fanfiction spaces. ;)
-
Can you clarify what you mean by this? by
on 2025-01-28 00:06:22 UTC
Reply
I think you made a typo in saying "the preference for romantic love uber alles", because I'm not sure what that means.
--Ls probably won't be using the concept of amatonormativity, unless as a trivia question
-
I can: It's a German phrase. by
on 2025-01-28 03:44:25 UTC
Reply
Translates to "above all," and perhaps carries a connotation of excessive dogmatism.
~Neshomeh
-
Should've guessed it was German. (nm) by
on 2025-01-28 11:21:32 UTC
Reply
-
Seconding this. by
on 2025-01-27 19:46:31 UTC
Reply
Female characters honestly get shafted in all sorts of ways, including very often being written solely as romantic lovers or love interests with nothing else going on in their lives. The world loses nothing by having more female characters fulfilled by friendships and activities, without needing to be/do anything else in order to be worthy.
And that goes for real women, too. {= )
~Neshomeh
-
Alright, thanks for the advice 😊 by
on 2025-01-27 16:10:15 UTC
Reply
Honestly, sometimes I doubt my own writing, which is why I regularly check in with the comm to make sure my writing doesn't violate the general spirit. Do stop me if I come off as repetitive or attention-seeking.
-
Doubting your own writing is normal for young writers! by
on 2025-01-27 16:52:32 UTC
Reply
And honestly older writers, too--we all have these moments of doubt regarding the reception of our work. But I can say for sure that writing for yourself and what you want to see will always make for better writing than writing for the opinions of other people.