Subject: Re; Minis
Author:
Posted on: 2012-06-11 22:49:00 UTC

I had forgotten about Mordicants. Or confused them with Greater Dead or something. Maybe I still am? I don't know. But yeah, that would definitely fit the big bad monster role for a mini. I wouldn't worry too much about the cuteness factor; I'd say that rule's been broken muchly by now.

I agree that a mini-necromancer would be very generic, since every fantasy continuum ever seems to have some variety. Even with the Bells setting them apart. The Bells themselves would make better Old Kingdom minis, if we were only looking at these two.

Charter Sendings! Hadn't thought of this at all, but I actually think it's pretty great. Very unique to the series, and figures heavily in every book (haven't read the new one yet, but I'm assuming). They do tend to have a variety of shapes, though, which could get tricky for each PPCer to remember what each particular mini looked like. This also makes me think of mini-Charter Marks, which have rough;y the same advantages and weaknesses as mini-Charter Sendings, I think.

The mini-Moggets idea has kind of grown on me, although I generally don't like minis modeled after a specific character. Kittens are just too cute, though. With the bells present to set them apart from other feline minis (and to give the mini-Moggets a way to screw with their owners), I think they would make a good choice, too. Plus, we ought to have a mini-feline for the mini-Mr. Muggles and mini-Hounds of the Baskervilles to chase around HQ, and cause disproportionate damage as a result!

(Note about zombie minis: I know, at the very least, the video game Left 4 Dead has a kind of zombie known as a Tank as its mini. There might be others too.)

Reply Return to messages