Subject: RE:
Author:
Posted on: 2012-03-01 15:02:00 UTC

Well, there are multiple problems in my case, but SP&G isn't it.

The sheer length is one of the biggest concerns as the author-inserted char- I mean, Lucie, last of the "angeli" (none of whom exist in Middle-Earth)goes throughout the ENTIRE course of the LOTR canon (minus Sam and Frodo post-Falls of Raos.).

Componding it, to be perfectly honest, when we peel back the canon, the "supporting" canons, the fictional and downright heretical history and "specul powerz" of Lucie, what do you have? Merely a sappy love story between Lucie and Aragorn. And don't think Arwen would merely abide by this if she was her canonical self, oh no.

In fact, I quote:

"Strider? Oh you mean Aragorn? He went to get ready for the council; my brother has trouble been presentable".

"Aragorn? I never knew that was his name, your brother?"

"Yes, he is Aragorn son of Arathorn, Isildur's heir. And yes he is my brother by adoption even though he is an absolute pain".


Urgh, and finally, I honestly seem to be having a hard time trying to be humerous within the context of the sporking. I mean, the occasional agent pratfall or misteleportation definately occurs, but I think my attempt at humor is sorely lacking.

I dunno whether I should continue with the original wiped off the face of the Word world (even though I acknowledge said deletion and Deletion occurs towards the end) or lay it to rest and start anew.

Reply Return to messages