Subject: Generally negative
Author:
Posted on: 2011-08-04 13:48:00 UTC

But not totally. For instance, Robert Graves' "I, Claudius" is technically RPF, being essentially the fictional autobiography of the emperor Claudius. Compare/contrast Ralph Nader's "Only The Super-Rich Can Save Us," (which, I feel obliged to add, I was very disappointed in; Ralph Nader writing RPF should be the crackiest thing ever committed to paper, not this dull slog) where a whole bunch of billionaires get together and decide to change the world with a parrot mascot.

I think RPF can be done well (as in the case of Claudius) as long as the author bears in mind that they are writing about a real person and does their best to treat the subject(s) with respect. I'd also add that, as a point of courtesy, one shouldn't write about people who are still alive. Writing RPF as an extension of one's own lurid fantasies is just sleazy.

Reply Return to messages