I cracked up SO. HARD. by
Jacer
on 2011-05-27 03:04:00 UTC
Reply
I believe the correct term might be "guffaw."
It reminds me of... by
Sergio Turbo
on 2011-05-26 18:20:00 UTC
Reply
A bottle of shampoo that owns my little sister. No discernible brand or product name, a shooting-star-shaped bottle (yeah), and the content was a blue liquid with a very high percentage of glitter.
Yeah, that's with no doubt Mary Sue Shampoo. Good thing she doesn't use it. (She received it as a gift.)
Fantastic! by
Elemarth
on 2011-05-25 01:47:00 UTC
Reply
If this doesn't become a PPC joke, I'm going to be very disappointed in everyone here.
Do you think they taste like glitter? Are they dangerous because of the possibility of sue-ifying agents? Are they MADE of Mary Sues?
This has so many possibilities!
You know... by
HerrWozzeck
on 2011-05-24 23:03:00 UTC
Reply
...It's making me think of other strangely named candies out there.
So... does anybody else know any strangely-named chocolates? Could be interesting to see what we've got.
So to kick us off...
Do you know that there's a Mozart chocolate?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozartkugel
Bwahahahaha! by
WhiteRaven93
on 2011-05-24 22:54:00 UTC
Reply
That's hilarious! I wonder what Mary Sue candy tastes like. Unnaturally perfect? Maybe it's not such a bad name after all. ^_^
Hm... by
HerrWozzeck
on 2011-05-24 22:44:00 UTC
Reply
The crazy part is that the company is apparently 63 years old. How this flew under the radar while Mary Sue was becoming a wide-spread internet term is beyond me.
Still, this is absolutely hilairous. Anyone wanna leave one on the bed for new agents in new RC's? ;)
Re: So I was browsing the internet... by
Meta
on 2011-05-24 22:44:00 UTC
Reply
Does that mean there's a PPC Candy out there too?