Subject: Aster is a girl.
Author:
Posted on: 2011-03-09 20:03:00 UTC
If there was more to refute I would've gone further than just a subject line reply.
Subject: Aster is a girl.
Author:
Posted on: 2011-03-09 20:03:00 UTC
If there was more to refute I would've gone further than just a subject line reply.
This sounds interesting enough that I might give some of these a run. I'd like to know that I'm devil's advocating some decent stuff :P
http://agent-chliever.livejournal.com/ Missions may be NSFW, so be warned.
I think I started beta-reading at mission eight. So, the last three. In all fairness, there were pretty big reasons for my stepping in, but they were unrelated to the issue of Agent Chliever being what he is. That was all covered (to my satisfaction, anyway) in his Permission thread.
~Neshomeh
I mean, unless the community itself gives permission, in which case it's not really an invasion, it's just another spinoff.
I am going to assume that having a Great Unclean One as an Agent accomplishes something for your story-telling and narrative, i.e. there is a purpose for it being a Great Unclean One instead of, say, a talking aardvaark. If you could figure out what that purpose is, it would be easy to think of an Agent who fills that niche without being a piece of an evil god.
Since what we have is a multiverse, could it be that Chliever The Corroder could be reabsorbed only if he is in his original continuum? After all, the evil god is supposed to be present only there. If Chliever isn't in his reach, taking him back would be quite hard. So, keeping him out of Warhammerverse should be enough.
That's my two eurocents (€ 0.02) about it.
You're just trying to get around it, so stop doubling back on the issue. You un-canoned your agents, the die is cast, have the spine to stick to that. Though I doubt anyone'd stop you making some new ones if you wanted.
But the whole discussion below this was if a Great Unclean One was too much, Permission or not.
The question now is if it's a good idea to bring that character back/make it canon again.
I say yes. It is too much. But if you can pull it off, then great! Things that are too much can be OK if pulled off well.
If he can pull it off well, not do something over-the-top/Stuish/make it work, then... OK!
Plus, I think he was talking more in general than just about Chliever.
If there was more to refute I would've gone further than just a subject line reply.
Amnesia is terrible like that.
These words you've used, "ridiculous" and "absurd." As I recall, that was the idea. It's so ridiculous and absurd as to be silly. Possibly even funny, if we'd just not take it too seriously. So, I'm wondering why people are insisting on taking it so very, very seriously, like this is SRS BSNS or something.
~Neshomeh
It just seemed to work up my Suspension of Disbelief particularly flagrantly. I'm not trying to be acerbic here, but I would think there is a level at which things are getting too ridiculous and absurd, sliding into nonsense. For me it seems to be at Great Unclean Ones.
The handwavium will need to be industrial-grade in this one.
...is that I need to make a Great Old One agent. :P
My biggest hurdle would of course be getting them to use any of the PPC equipment with the notable lack of any appendage that isn't a paw, claw, tentacle or pseudopod.
My first response was "why would you want to?" since, in theory, some of those appendages could probably be made to work the buttons—but then it occurred to me that an even bigger hurdle would be getting them to use the equipment at all without shorting it out simply by touching it. Whatever's inside the CADs is pretty sensitive, after all.
~Neshomeh
It's not so much taking things too seriously as treating it like an actual written setting instead of just a random collection of jokes, some more tired than others. You can have humour while still having some respect for how well things are written and what's just too much, after all.
KG, Miah is right - you're being overly antagonistic and authoritative, and flirting with implied personal attacks, be it through unanticipated wording or otherwise.
July, you're way past the line of personal attacks. This is no place to pick on someone else who is part of the community, through direct response or implication.
Please direct all replies to rule one of the Board Constution. It's not just a good idea, it's the law.
I also felt that KG was being a bit too harsh, and July was reasonably trying to get him to lighten up (and also kept her berating light hearted by sprinkling her lecture with jokes).
You are saying that the reason Chliever should not make his work canon again is that it has no respect for how well things are written and what's just too much? I find it hard to believe that this is the case. You see, I am familiar with the work of Chliever's major beta-reader. I know that Neshomeh wouldn't put her name on anything that lacked respect for good writing and I am fairly certain she knows what is just too much.
So, either you are mistaken in your assertion or you are calling Neshomeh's judgment and writing skills into question just as much as Chliever's.
You're misconstruing a general attitude problem as a personal attack. KG never said anything in regards to Neshomeh at all, and I'm sure if he was even aware that Neshomeh was involved in the betaing and permission process, much less aware that his reply would have been taken as a personal affront against her, he'd be far more polite and more selective in his word choice, I am sure.
Try and cool your jets there.
...whether it would happen, but whether the PPC, knowing what COULD happen, would've recruited an Agent like mine in the first place. Basically, I'm asking if my Agent's very existence, as a member of the PPC, is a logical error/continuity problem/whatever.
Surely one of the biggest problems that you need to deal with is the plague that an agent of Nurgle will bring to HQ. Being out of his home continuum would be explaination enough to prevent him being absorbed by Nurgle, but do you really want to bring a plague bearer into the corridors of HQ?
I'd say probably. Hey, we somehow got the Mysterious Somebody, I can see a character like yours slipping through the cracks - or, more likely, there is a DoSAT device, or a canonical reason, or something that guarantees that the worst will not come to past. It's a plothole that allows for a lot of interesting explanations.
I'm by no means an authority on This Sort Of Thing, or anything, but I'd say go ahead-- as I said before, if you want to go back to writing, do so; if you'd feel better with an explanation in place, write that first.
I typed "a while ago" and then "a while back." Sowwy.