Subject: The point isn't killing Sues, though.
Author:
Posted on: 2010-07-22 04:59:00 UTC

I mean, I know some agents get worked up and homicidal; and it's pretty much excusable when they're facing tiny-waisted, urple-haired, personality-free creatures who are basically mind-raping the canon characters and endangering entire worlds that the agents love.

But...

It's never been about killing Sues. Even in the beginning, the point was to get the characters back in character, get the continuum back in shape, repair the damage. And however homicidal agents get, it'll always be about the canon.

I do think that sometimes we end up writing agents who step somewhat out of character when they kill their Sues. Some agents do really have the capacity for true cruelty; but most really don't. Most agents want to protect the continuum, do the Duty; so sometimes I think maybe writers go a little overboard with assassinations, having their agents do things that are unnecessarily painful, which said agents don't seem like the type to do.

Many agent pairs I know of are the type who should really prefer quick, clean kills; or else arranging things so that the canon itself gets to kill the Sue (things like locking gazes with the Basilisk in Harry Potter, for example; I think it must help repair the canon to have the Sue die in a canon-appropriate fashion). But some writers seem to feel like they've got to make Sue deaths painful and dramatic, when their agents just really don't seem like the type, even when utterly enraged, to do anything more than just shoot her down like a dog (apologies to dogs everywhere) and make sure the canons are okay.

Reply Return to messages