Subject: Which means...
Author:
Posted on: 2010-07-19 08:42:00 UTC
... that since Melkor could never create actual life (only Iluvatar can do that - see Aule and the dwarves as proof), they have to be either a) corrupted something-elses, b) Maiar, or c) mere extensions of Morgoth's or Sauron's will.
Trolls seem a little too common to be Maiar, and apparently act of their own accord. Might they be corrupted Stone Giants (see The Hobbit)? Tolkien also mentioned 'Tree-giants' seen in the Shire, so the Ent=Giant connection is there. If Melkor took Stone Giants and twisted them, giving them a form of intelligence in exchange for somewhat reduced stature, might that account for them? I suspect Yavanna was quite ticked off to see her own creation mocked by creatures made of stone - her husband's domain.
That would allow trolls to breed, but what about dragons? Tolkien's dragons come in four combinations: fire-breathing and not, flying and not. Glaurung was fire-breathing but not flying. The Cold-drakes were non-fire-breathing, but some could fly. Smaug and Ancalagon could do both. The Cold-drakes, at least, seem to have bred true, but it's entirely possible that Smaug himself was created by Morgoth. Certainly he is described as the last great Fire-drake. If this is the case, might (and I'm theorising completely here) Cold-drakes have been either pre-Melkor, or some form of corrupted snake, while Fire-drakes, being more powerful and having an unnatural ability, were Maiar in built shells, like Balrogs? Of course, their bodies could well have been 'built' by twisting something pre-existing anyway...
hS