Subject: The Narnia ones, I think.
Author:
Posted on: 2009-05-21 05:29:00 UTC
I'm going to go with mini-Lethrblaka, as those are rather unique to the canon, and it's easy enough to change if something happens.
-
Eragon minis? by
on 2009-05-20 00:33:00 UTC
Reply
What are they?
-
I think there's an Eragon OFU hiding out there somewhere. by
on 2009-05-20 06:47:00 UTC
Reply
It might show what the mini'd be for that fandom.
-
Re: I think there's an Eragon OFU hiding out there somewhere. by
on 2009-05-20 23:51:00 UTC
Reply
According to OFUA the minis for the Inheritance Cycle are mini-dragons.
-
But dragons aren't really a 'monster' in Eragon (nm) by
on 2009-05-21 07:13:00 UTC
Reply
-
Ooooh. by
on 2009-05-21 00:17:00 UTC
Reply
Which came first, the Narnia mini-dragons or the Eragon mini-Dragons?
-
The Narnia ones, I think. by
on 2009-05-21 05:29:00 UTC
Reply
I'm going to go with mini-Lethrblaka, as those are rather unique to the canon, and it's easy enough to change if something happens.
-
Not sure, but I think we all want the Narnia ones to stay (nm) by
on 2009-05-21 01:33:00 UTC
Reply
-
Re: Eragon minis? by
on 2009-05-20 06:36:00 UTC
Reply
Mini-Ra'zac perhaps?
-
Well, dragons are out. by
on 2009-05-20 03:19:00 UTC
Reply
But what other monsters does the Inheritanceverse have? Anything particularly iconic?
-
Well... by
on 2009-05-20 03:40:00 UTC
Reply
...nothing much original, except for the Lethrblaka. Mini-Lethrblaka, then?
-
After a Google Image Search, I have to say I approve. by
on 2009-05-21 05:03:00 UTC
Reply
They fit the general theme of mini-dom very well.
-
Um... the wiki doesn't say. by
on 2009-05-20 00:54:00 UTC
Reply
Narnia already has mini-dragons, so we'll find something else.
-
People WANT to PPC Eragon? (nm) by
on 2009-05-20 00:54:00 UTC
Reply
-
Er... *cringes* by
on 2009-05-20 12:42:00 UTC
Reply
I actually like Eragon... book, that is, even people who haven't read the book think the movie sucks.... But I really, really hate Twilight.
-
*appears briefly to applaud* by
on 2009-05-22 20:42:00 UTC
Reply
I like Eragon as well (book only, also Twilight hate) and it's always good to see someone else who's willing to PPC the series.
So. :) -
:) Go smileys go! (nm) by
on 2009-05-23 01:49:00 UTC
Reply
-
Re: Er... *cringes* by
on 2009-05-21 08:08:00 UTC
Reply
Virtual high five, Maudlin. Personally, I enjoyed Eragon, though Eldest left a lot to be desired.
Twilight, on the other hand, left even more to be desired. I read the first book, and I don't plan on reading further. -
Oddly enough, it was the reverse for me. by
on 2009-05-22 03:49:00 UTC
Reply
Twilight was alright, but Eragon just bored me.
Maybe I'm just weird like that? -
We're all weird here... (nm) by
on 2009-05-23 01:27:00 UTC
Reply
-
Vampires do not sparkle. by
on 2009-05-22 00:52:00 UTC
Reply
Everybody say it with me! *chants*
-
It's not just that... by
on 2009-05-22 02:36:00 UTC
Reply
I was waiting the entire book for an epic vampire vs. vampire battle, but RIGHT as it's about to happen, the author has the main character pass out, and she completely skips it! Oh, sure, LATER she describes it briefly, but come on! When that happened I had a momentary BSOD.
-
No to mention... by
on 2009-05-23 01:49:00 UTC
Reply
...biological impossibilities. What is the sparkle caused by? Do sparklevamps have some mica-rich substance running in their veins in lieu of blood? If so, what purpose does it serve? How did it get there? Sparklevamps have no fangs. Normal human teeth are inadequate for piercing skin and flesh efficiently; therefore, sparklevamps must have to carry a pair of scalpels with which they can inflict the traditional double bite marks. However, no mention is made of this.
And then there's the thing where Bella gets pregnant... -
Good on you ... by
on 2009-05-21 03:13:00 UTC
Reply
... for having the guts to say that :)
Personally, I didn't like Eragon. But then, there's a lot of books I don't like. And it's a published canon. That means it has a Word World. It *certainly* has badfic. Ergo, somewhere in the depths of the organisation, there WILL be PPC Agents protecting it.
If you like Eragon, good for you. It's almost refreshing to see someone say so :) -
It's not called "the Duty" for nothing. (nm) by
on 2009-05-20 05:35:00 UTC
Reply
-
Well... by
on 2009-05-20 04:35:00 UTC
Reply
Some people also want to PPC things like Harry Potter, Discworld, Doom, Doctor Who, MASH, LotR, etc.
What's the difference between PPCing a fanfic in one of those fandoms and Eragon? -
That most people hate Eragon? :P by
on 2009-05-20 10:03:00 UTC
Reply
Or rather, while there may be people, even people on the Board, who don't, the PPC Hive Mind (the Porg?) has decided that It hates Eragon. And therefore that no components of It will want anything to do with it.
hS -
:P by
on 2009-05-20 17:54:00 UTC
Reply
The group mind doesn't hate it enough to totally want to run away from it.
After all, a few people have asked to PPC Eragon itself- as well as a few other canons they dislike too.
:P -
Oh, not "Porg". Please. I think of Porky Pig... by
on 2009-05-20 10:34:00 UTC
Reply
But that said, yes, we do seem to have something of a hive mind, don't we? It's a fine line between camraderie and keeping to the constitution's statement that anyone can like anything. Not saying it's a bad or good thing; just something to keep in mind.
-
It's...convoluted. by
on 2009-05-20 00:57:00 UTC
Reply
A Star Wars 'fic in which the 'Sue unexplainably has Dragon Rider ties, and spells a few names wrong. Therefore, the minis would be Eragon minis and not mini-Rancors.
-
Oh, a crossover with something actually good. by
on 2009-05-20 01:22:00 UTC
Reply
That makes sense.
-
Well, if even the original is bad... by
on 2009-05-20 00:57:00 UTC
Reply
...then try to imagine how awful the badfic must be.