Subject: It's not a retcon if there's space in the timeline for it!
Author:
Posted on: 2013-04-21 21:34:00 UTC

That's always been my policy, at least. It's not retconning, it's introduction of previously unknown information!

It wouldn't be retconning if, for example, a being of unknown species was said after a while to be a member of a known species(as long as he/she matched the criteria for being part of that species; to give a Star Trek example, passing a Klingon off as a Xindi would be futile and ridiculous). It would be retconning if, say, some crucial detail about Slorp's creation was changed after the fact, or some such.

Then again, I've always had a stigma against the term "retcon", since most people that bring it out tend to mess with established parts of their own continuity, which always strikes me as lazy writing.
Writing that segment for the Multiverse Monitor isn't messing with your continuity, but it is adjusting for the stories of other writers during the same time, which is different because it doesn't damage existing events.

I'm going to stop now before I start to pontificate unintentionally. I don't want this turning into a rant about word choice.

That "she was a bit busy with handling some of the other stray Canons" line makes me want to ask DawnFire what the Reader is like so I can have her show up to send Sherlock and Watson home. It'd be a better idea than what I'd been thinking of before.

Reply Return to messages