Subject: The PGs tend to take a little while to get to them. (nm)
Author:
Posted on: 2009-03-24 05:25:00 UTC
-
A question... by
on 2009-03-24 03:03:00 UTC
Reply
I noticed that threads asking for permission are rarely responded to. Is there some reason for this, or have the PGs just not got around to it?
-
Sometimes happens when the board is moving crazy fast. by
on 2009-03-24 06:51:00 UTC
Reply
Topics get pushed further from the top with every new thread made and in some cases onto the next page. It makes it hard to catch up with, sometimes.
Also, dude, not to be pushy, but any chance you can slow down with the constant thread making? Since it's mostly question stuff or checking, it's totally fine to keep it in one thread; it just makes the board go faster and makes stuff like permission requests harder for the PGs to catch.
There's four alone from just you, but you're not the only person doing this, so don't feel like I'm calling out or whatever, I'm just pointing it out. -
Sorry by
on 2009-03-24 16:17:00 UTC
Reply
A lot of my questions have nothing to do with each other, so I thought it would be weird to put them all in one thread.
-
Nope, it's a good idea. by
on 2009-03-26 00:26:00 UTC
Reply
They're all still questions; tacking on a "and another thing" post to your previous thread is far preferable to throwing up a new thread, y'know?
hS -
Weird? In the PPC? There is something wrong with this? (nm) by
on 2009-03-25 12:31:00 UTC
Reply
-
Nobody said anything about weirdness. (nm) by
on 2009-03-26 02:26:00 UTC
Reply
-
Also, they sometimes converse by email by
on 2009-03-24 05:35:00 UTC
Reply
Especially when there's one or two little issues that need to be sorted out; it's not polite to air everyone's problems on a public board. Private correspondance is better. But if you do find that your request has slipped off the page unanswered, then don't feel rejected. It's possible that no PG was around at the time or that they just didn't have time.
-
The PGs tend to take a little while to get to them. (nm) by
on 2009-03-24 05:25:00 UTC
Reply