Subject: Re: Yeah, go ahead.
Author:
Posted on: 2009-01-14 11:13:00 UTC
Why is that RC designation unique to Jay and Acacia? How come no-one else has a letter-designated RC?
-
RC Question! by
on 2009-01-05 22:47:00 UTC
Reply
Does anybody know anything about the apparent trend of adding letters after RCs that have the number 32? (32C, 32D) I ask because that's something along the lines of what I'd like to do.
However, I don't want to tread on anyone's toes if it's Their Thing or whatever, so I have been advised to check first to see if it's just a coincidence. -
I hadn't realised there was a trend by
on 2009-01-06 14:28:00 UTC
Reply
There's only two of them (32C and 32D). Could be that they're for agents created by the same author.
My agents are in 80s as they mainly work in fandoms that were on TV in the eighties. But I also use an RC that has not yet received a number (I figured it would be easier to find as you wouldn't know what you were looking for). -
'Kay, thanks for the help. (nm) by
on 2009-01-06 17:29:00 UTC
Reply
-
Yeah, go ahead. by
on 2009-01-06 04:14:00 UTC
Reply
I guess I'm the unofficial editor of the List of RCs. I don't know why the trend has started with the number 32, but it's fine to add letters after a RC number. (The problem arises with adding letters BEFORE the number. Only Jay and Acacia have that.)
-
Re: Yeah, go ahead. by
on 2009-01-14 11:13:00 UTC
Reply
Why is that RC designation unique to Jay and Acacia? How come no-one else has a letter-designated RC?
-
Aren't those Kippur's RCs? by
on 2009-01-06 17:28:00 UTC
Reply
Her agents, that is. It was kind of a running joke that no one knew where 32A was, as I recall.
~Neshomeh -
Considering that we have #0.0000something and the like... by
on 2009-01-06 03:49:00 UTC
Reply
You can probably do anything you want. But I'm not the expert. :)
-
Re: RC Question! by
on 2009-01-05 23:35:00 UTC
Reply
If that's allowed, I'll move my Agents back into 1138 B.
-
Bet 1138 B is nowhere near 1138 by
on 2009-01-06 00:45:00 UTC
Reply
Given the way the PPC works, 1138, which I was lucky enough to grab, is liable to be in an entirely different spot- most of the time. XD
-
Re: Bet 1138 B is nowhere near 1138 by
on 2009-01-06 17:38:00 UTC
Reply
Well, that settles it. I just wanted 1138 because...do you really have to ask? :p
-
Given that I grabbed it fast as I could... by
on 2009-01-06 22:14:00 UTC
Reply
no, I really don't have to ask why. :p