Subject: Um.
Author:
Posted on: 2008-08-14 22:07:00 UTC

It's cool if LotR isn't your bag, but comparing the classic foundation of an entire genre of literature to common songfic is not going to sit well with many people here. Just so you know.

The following isn't personal, it's just me tangentially explaining what I think.

Language and thought are connected. There was a time when speech took as long as it needed to say what was meant, before TV and the Internet came and thoughts were reduced to sound bytes and then became as stunted as the contents of the average text message. Maybe there's no room for lyricism in modern language, but I, for one, think that's an unfortunate loss. How do you learn to think in beautiful language if you never experience it? What can we say about the contents of our thoughts if we can't express them with some finesse?

I'm not saying that all language should be flowery and poetic, because that gets annoying, but there's a big difference between a songficcer inserting lines of pop songs into their writing because they thought it would be cool, and Tolkien inventing a little rhyme because, for that moment in the story, it said exactly what he meant it to say. That's part of what makes a great writer, after all: The ability to impart great meaning with a few carefully chosen words.

I'm going to get off the soapbox, but I close with a quote from Charles de Lint's "The Conjure Man," which sums up what good writing is all about:

"The stories are just stories--they entertain, they make one laugh or cry--but if they have any worth, they carry within them a deeper resonance that remains long after the final page is turned, or the storyteller has come to the end of his or her tale. Both aspects of the story are necessary for it to have any worth."

~Neshomeh

Reply Return to messages