Subject: Re: Keep getting confused about World One
Author:
Posted on: 2014-08-10 18:12:00 UTC

In the Myst series, which has Word Worlds of its own (after a fashion), a major point was that capital-'W' Writers did not create the places described in their Books, but simply established links to worlds that had previously existed. I think that World 1 is similar, in that all of the canon worlds are as real as 1 but don't really have any reference relating them to it until their stories are written*. World 1 isn't "special" except as a place where many such links originate.**

This seems to fit with the origins of the PPC in that the Flowers directly entered World 1 from outside of it without anything about them first being written here.


The long and short of is that explaining World 1's basic nature would be as "simple" as explaining any alternate universe: "It's just like your Earth was in 2014, only there are no Forerunner ruins"; "It's just like your Earth, only wizards don't exist"; "It's another world called Earth, where there are only Men and everyone uses something called "electrical technology" instead of magic." Explaining the existential aspects requires a good understanding of the weird stuff up above, but once that's done there really isn't much to it other than "World 1 is what's on the other end of one of your connections and they were the ones who initiated it."

*I don't think they're fully-formed but inaccessible, but that's where things get weird. I'm imagining them in a sort of possibility flux where they aren't fully-realized so much as just potential- if you have a background in computer science you can think of them as constantly-shifting garbage data that has yet to be referenced, with the canon work acting as a pointer or filesystem that makes them comprehensible and stable; if you have a background in physics you can think of them as in a state of superposition, or as a quantum foam; if you have no background in either of these areas I don't really know how to explain it and it's probably too esoteric to matter anyway so why did I just type this monster paragraph?

** This does imply that when an author changes things in a story, the old story is still around and the "changed" one is just a slightly different universe that has always been that way, that the pointer "Star Trek" now direct to instead. That in turn opens up the possibility of "cloning" vast numbers of essentially the same character or object by collecting instances of them from other versions of their story that are only slightly altered... in the Myst series Linking was elastic in that very slight changes could be written and propagated through the Link to actually alter the world they were in, whereas large ones would just change the Link to point to a different world.

Reply Return to messages