Subject: I'd vastly prefer you not say much in English either. (nm)
Author:
Posted on: 2014-06-17 11:49:00 UTC
-
World Cup thread! by
on 2014-06-14 07:59:00 UTC
Reply
Expand this post →
-
As an England fan... by
on 2014-06-18 17:29:00 UTC
Reply
Expand this post →
-
I'm rooting for Japan by
on 2014-06-15 21:30:00 UTC
Reply
Well, mostly because I was once in a commercial with Nagatomo... I just sat around with a few other people and we just had fun (and played soccer :P)
-
Sweet. by
on 2014-06-16 03:35:00 UTC
Reply
What are your feelings on the Côte d'Ivoire - Japan game? I can't help but feel devastated for the blue samurai after those two quick goals.
-
My One Cent by
on 2014-06-14 15:29:00 UTC
Reply
To be perfectly honest, I don't know a whole lot about the world cup. I tend to root for whoever is winning at the moment, and I am liable to "switch sides" whenever the other team pulls ahead. In short, I don't often follow soccer, but when I do, I just watch it to see a good game.
On another note, I notice several people on this thread calling it "football". I'm American, and therefore a member of one of the only countries in the world who calls it "soccer", but I can't be the only one, right? I'm not that out of the ordinary. -
I call it futball, Mexican pronunciation. (nm) by
on 2014-06-14 18:10:00 UTC
Reply
-
Oh, cool! by
on 2014-06-14 18:34:00 UTC
Reply
That's awesome. :)
-
But I'm American and can't say much in Mexican (nm) by
on 2014-06-14 18:40:00 UTC
Reply
-
I'd vastly prefer you not say much in English either. (nm) by
on 2014-06-17 11:49:00 UTC
Reply
-
Not cool, Wobbles. by
on 2014-06-17 16:33:00 UTC
Reply
This comment is in no way constructive (it doesn't explain what zdimensia did wrong, and it is well after others had already explained), and it is a personal attack (just a wordier way of saying "shut up"). It is a flame, and that is against Article 3 of the Constitution. You are consistently very rude, and I am getting tired of you needing to be told that it isn't acceptable. Re-read Article 3. If you can't follow it, then you will probably want to find a new place to hang out.
-Phobos -
Dude. No. by
on 2014-06-16 00:26:00 UTC
Reply
What Ekyl said - the language is Spanish. Mexican is a nationality. It's disrespectful to use the two interchangeably like that. Please don't do that.
-
The language is called Spanish! (nm) by
on 2014-06-14 21:31:00 UTC
Reply
-
Well if what I speak isn't technically English (nm) by
on 2014-06-14 22:43:00 UTC
Reply
-
Referring to it as "Mexican" is racist. (nm) by
on 2014-06-14 22:46:00 UTC
Reply
-
Though... by
on 2014-06-15 10:41:00 UTC
Reply
There's certainly a dialect of Spanish spoken in Mexico and it's called Mexican Spanish.
-
Irrelevant and you know it. Plus inapplicable to context. (nm) by
on 2014-06-17 00:00:00 UTC
Reply
-
The context is speaking... by
on 2014-06-17 13:40:00 UTC
Reply
Which you are ignoring just so you can scream rascist. It would be bigoted against a nation, which contains a gamut of ancestry.
And yes, I threw away my win by not staying out of this once someone threw the "racist" card.
Stop stirring up the mob over a little thing like acknowledging natural language drift. -
Er... no? by
on 2014-06-17 15:14:00 UTC
Reply
Expand this post →
-
Neither can I by
on 2014-06-14 18:50:00 UTC
Reply
I live in San Antonio, where more than half the population speaks Spanish, and I can’t speak Spanish either.
-
To be honest, football's never interested me much... by
on 2014-06-14 14:41:00 UTC
Reply
...but I know my duty as good citizen and will cheer for my country's team.
-
It's the wrong shaped ball :( (nm) by
on 2014-06-14 12:14:00 UTC
Reply
-
Too few vuvuzelas. (nm) by
on 2014-06-14 10:35:00 UTC
Reply
-
>Implying permanent ear damage is a good thing (nm) by
on 2014-06-14 10:38:00 UTC
Reply
-
>using greentext by
on 2014-06-14 13:46:00 UTC
Reply
>PPC
>implying you've been visiting /b/
>implying the emperor protects -
>Implying /b/ is the only board that grentexts by
on 2014-06-14 18:57:00 UTC
Reply
>mfw I'm sure the random board is just as as cancerous as they say
-
>talking about /b/ by
on 2014-06-14 19:44:00 UTC
Reply
Didn't you read the rules?
-
>Why are we talking about /b/? by
on 2014-06-14 20:41:00 UTC
Reply
I don't need any rules. Here is my proof:
∆
∆ ∆ -
Sorry? Couldn't hear you over- BZZRRRRRRRZZZZZZZZRRRRRRRR... (nm by
on 2014-06-14 11:28:00 UTC
Reply