Being the person who discovers the Minis by
Hieronymus Graubart
on 2014-05-30 11:06:00 UTC
Reply
of an unexplored canon is a great honor that should not be taken lightly.
Unfortunately I don’t know anything about The Legacy of Kain, so I can’t help you with the details. But there are some general rules that can be derived from watching Minis in other canons.
There may be some exceptions for word worlds which I don’t know well, but generally the Minis are based on one species, thus "just follow the species that their namesakes come from" doesn’t sound like a good idea. Keeping Minis consistent would be preferable over creating another exception. Also, a well-written Mini keeps the personality of the character it is supposed to be, but, with minor variations, the physical features of the species it is based on.
Often, the Minis are based on something that occurred only briefly in canon, not one of the main (antagonist) forces. This may disqualify demons, vampires, hylden and humans. Are there any minor monsters or machines that qualify as "creepy if their Mini versions weren’t so cute in the agents’ eyes"? (Machines? Yes, among others we have mini-telescreens from 1984).
Since the misspellings that spawn Minis shouldn’t exist in good writing, looking for something that "shouldn’t be there" may also help to find the Mini species. The reason why it "shouldn’t be there" may vary. In many canons, it involves "created by an evil being for malevolent purposes", like Balrogs, or it may just canonically be encountered in a place where it canonically shouldn’t live, like Aragog in Hogwart’s Forbidden Forrest (Acromantulas are supposed to be a tropical species). More examples may be found in this discussion of the Pokemon Minis.
Lacking knowledge, I cannot comment on this doppelganger business.
HG, trying to be helpful.