Subject: Depends on the Trekkie/Trekker.
Author:
Posted on: 2013-03-11 03:53:00 UTC

It's such a huge fandom that anything you think is universal will have people against it. With five series and ten movies, odds are you'll find people who hate or love any number of them. Semi-universal, though:
-(The Original Series) Kirk and Spock. Whether you slash or not, you still probably believe that their friendship is sacred. To some extent, the friendship of Kirk, Spock, and McCoy is regarded the same way, but since there aren't as many people who support a threesome it doesn't have quite the support of Kirk and Spock.
- (Voyager) Janeway/Chakotay over canonical Chakotay/Seven. There re some C/7 shippers, but they are in the minority. Very much so.
- (Voyager) "Threshold" isn't canon. Even the writers say so. Can't blame them - what show wants an episode where two of the main characters superevolve into mutant lizards and have mutant alien lizard babies?
- (The Next Generation) **SPOILER ALERT** Much of the fanbase (not all but a significant enough portion to put here) believes that Data didn't die in Star Trek: Nemesis. To be fair, there are a lot of hints of his return, and maybe he would have if Nemesis hadn't been a box office flop and therefore closed the door on Star Trek movies until the 2009 reboot. (Strangely enough, Data's death may have caused the movie to flop, seeing as he's a fan favorite.) Fanfiction abounds explaining his return or simply ignoring the issue. I myself have written a fic doing the former.
- (Voyager) A vast majority of fans agree that the last episode of Voyager didn't resolve everything, or at least, that there is potential for stories after it, to the point where seeing fanfiction tagged "Post Endgame" is like finding a Suefic in the LOTR archive.

You probably didn't read much of that unless you know Trek, but yeah, that's what I can think of. I think the reason Voyager has so much is because while it was excellent, it was plothole-ish, leading the fans to fill the plotholes.

(end Trek gush)

Reply Return to messages