Subject: Yeah, no.
Author:
Posted on: 2013-09-23 18:11:00 UTC
I'm going to have to agree with Techno-Dann here (albeit in a somewhat more vehement fashion). This does not strike me as being a good idea, in large part because it doesn't make sense considering the structure of the PPC and what the PPC does.
If a canon were to get loose in HQ, then the Department of External Security would likely step in and take down (in a non-lethal sense, of course) the renegade character. If not them, then there are hypothetically hundreds of well-trained agents who could deal with the situation as well. Bringing in more dangerous canons in an attempt to capture the rogue would be phenomenally ridiculous considering all that.
Even with that taken into consideration, I have to ask: why Azula? Why a Nazgul? Why two nigh-uncontrollable villains? If you were to bring another canon in, why not an individual who is an accomplished hunter/trapper? Someone like Mustrum Ridcully (Discworld) or Sir Hammerlock (Borderlands 2). Not only are they good at what they do, they're also relatively benign -- especially in comparison to the unhinged Azula or the Ring-bound Nazgul.
Finally, PPC stories -- and HQ stories in particular -- are not about canons. They're about our agents, and how they live and work and react to badfic. This idea seems to be focused on the antics of the canonical characters and this ultimate showdown of ultimate destiny. Where do the agents fit into that picture, besides as the well-meaning dolts who cause the problem in the first place?
I don't mean to sound like I'm being mean or spiteful, I'm just trying to explain why your idea doesn't fit in regards to what the PPC is all about. I apologize if I seem overly brusque in my explanation.