Subject: Thank you!
Author:
Posted on: 2015-07-04 06:41:00 UTC

Re: the gimmick - there were always going to be factors that aided it, and I admit I skewed the mission heavily to keep them in place. But even so! It's not so much 'she' I missed as 'her' - Sandra could never turn her head, for instance (though, as I said somewhere, in actual usage you'd just see 'their' all over the place).

As to gender: I accept that, since gender exists, people can, do, and should identify by way of it. But... well, perhaps I lack an understanding of the subject. But I find it difficult to come up with an attribute which needs to be called 'male' (or 'female', for that matter) without it being a) sexist (er, genderist?), b) sexual (which of course isn't gender), or c) a societal negative which would be better done away with (eg, 'men tend to be promoted further than women'). But that maybe reflects a lack of imagination on my part?

hS

Reply Return to messages