Subject: Oh gosh. Yes, please.
Author:
Posted on: 2015-06-25 05:33:00 UTC
Who could organize...hm. The Troupe, maybe? Another acting group? Bored agents? The Time Lords?
...I'll think a bit more :)
~DF
-
Anyone up for a PPC agent LARP role-play? by
on 2015-06-24 20:35:00 UTC
Reply
Before I start a thread on the Other Board, I'm curious to know how many would be interested in participating. There wouldn't be any limit to what your agents could LARP as; sic-fi, fantasy, steampunk, pirates,
blue Russian space goats, horror— basically, if you can think of it, your agents can play it.
Anyone interested? (And if anyone can think of who'd organize this in-universe, that'd be great. :P ) -
I'm up for it. But how do you get to the Other Board? (nm) by
on 2015-06-25 13:57:00 UTC
Reply
- You'll find your answer... by on 2015-06-25 16:32:00 UTC Reply
-
I'd be ecstatic to do this... by
on 2015-06-25 11:13:00 UTC
Reply
...but I haven't got Permission yet. Do the usual rules apply for this sort of thing?
But I've had interesting ideas for a real-life LARP involving Gallifreyan politics. So that could work...
I think agent!Kitty would have a lot of fun hamming it up as the Lady President or something, considering that I occasionally yell at my brother in what he's deemed my 'haughty Time Lady voice'. And then I promptly switch to Leela mode. :D -
The rule of thumb is... by
on 2015-06-25 16:30:00 UTC
Reply
That unless the person who starts/proposes/whatnot the RP says otherwise, they are only as canon as the people writing the spinoffs the agents of which appear in the RP say it is, and therefore you do not need Permission.
(You know you could have found the same answer in the wiki, right? Generally it's a good idea to look around before asking.) -
'Kay, thanks! (nm) by
on 2015-06-25 23:53:00 UTC
Reply
-
Oh gosh. Yes, please. by
on 2015-06-25 05:33:00 UTC
Reply
Who could organize...hm. The Troupe, maybe? Another acting group? Bored agents?
The Time Lords?
...I'll think a bit more :)
~DF -
I'm game! (nm) by
on 2015-06-25 01:47:00 UTC
Reply
-
I'd be up for that. (nm) by
on 2015-06-25 00:24:00 UTC
Reply
-
That sounds quite neat! :) (nm) by
on 2015-06-24 23:42:00 UTC
Reply
-
[sic]-fi. =] (nm) by
on 2015-06-24 20:39:00 UTC
Reply