Subject: Why not? (nm)
Author:
Posted on: 2016-02-11 19:06:00 UTC
-
Petition to name an element for Terry Pratchett. by
on 2016-02-11 10:38:00 UTC
Reply
Expand this post →
-
In my opinon, by
on 2016-02-12 06:11:00 UTC
Reply
The more hilariously wrong it is, the more we should do it.
-
Why not? (nm) by
on 2016-02-11 19:06:00 UTC
Reply
-
Couple of reasons. by
on 2016-02-11 21:17:00 UTC
Reply
Expand this post →
-
One other thing... by
on 2016-02-12 10:25:00 UTC
Reply
Surely the better candidate would be octiron, considering that it's the actual element. Or at least the solid form, which might be elemental and probably only is if you don't look hard enough. =]
-
There's also octogen, by
on 2016-02-12 10:42:00 UTC
Reply
which is apparently a gas that radiates raw magic. And octarines are magical glowing gemstones (presumably containing octiron in their structure?).
I'd imagine they picked Octarine for the name recognition.
hS -
Oooohhh!! Signed! (nm) by
on 2016-02-11 18:29:00 UTC
Reply
-
Yes, please. Signed. (nm) by
on 2016-02-11 14:28:00 UTC
Reply
-
Wouldn't ununoctium be more appropriate? (nm) by
on 2016-02-11 13:08:00 UTC
Reply
-
But Uuo is a noble gas. by
on 2016-02-11 13:56:00 UTC
Reply
That means it would traditionally end with -on, whereas the halogens - fluorine, chlorine, bromine, iodine, astatine - have the -ine ending.
Though IUPAC seem to want every new element to end in -ium these days, which is boring and will break both those patterns. Owell.
hS -
And signed. by
on 2016-02-11 12:10:00 UTC
Reply
I haven't been able to get my hands on many of his books but the ones that I have read were phenomenal. (And my birthday's in a few months, so who knows? Might be getting some more for myself...)
I'm gonna be keeping an ear out to see what happens. -
Signed. by
on 2016-02-11 11:11:00 UTC
Reply
Expand this post →
-
The most ridiculously named elements... by
on 2016-02-11 11:24:00 UTC
Reply
... are probably Yttrium (39), Terbium (65), Erbium (68), and Ytterbium (70), because they're all named after the same place.
Camels, of course, are expert mathematicians/biplanes/cigarettes.
hS -
Precisely! by
on 2016-02-11 11:26:00 UTC
Reply
And I will take that as a general positive opinion regarding camels.
-July, plotting -
July. Please don't send me a camel. by
on 2016-02-11 11:30:00 UTC
Reply
They
spithave too many moving partscause canceroh wait I know what works for all three: they smell. ^_^
hS -
It'd be a mite difficult to ship a camel from the ship. by
on 2016-02-11 11:34:00 UTC
Reply
I will take due consideration and not send you a single camel.
I'll find one for each of you, so you don't have to share.
-July, looping -
... by
on 2016-02-11 11:45:00 UTC
Reply
Expand this post →
-
And that is how England became colonized by camels. by
on 2016-02-11 11:50:00 UTC
Reply
That said, they're actually quite expensive, which is boggling.
I suppose I could send you goats instead, but those are already endemic.
-July, who price checked -
Protectors of the Parade of Camels? =] (nm) by
on 2016-02-11 16:16:00 UTC
Reply
-
How you guys ever noticed... by
on 2016-02-11 17:07:00 UTC
Reply
That every single camel looks like it's totally baked?
-
Caramel-tone camels? (nm) by
on 2016-02-11 23:06:00 UTC
Reply