Subject: Couple of reasons.
Author:
Posted on: 2016-02-11 21:17:00 UTC

The main one is that name proposals have to come from the institute that discovered the element. In this case it's a cooperative effort between Russia's JINR in Dubna and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California. So petitioning IUPAC is pointless - they'll only accept ideas from the contributing labs. (Luckily, the petition also specifies those two.)

Secondly, most of the work seems to have been done by the Russians - who one assumes aren't big Pratchett fans.

Thirdly, IUPAC's rules say that elements must be named for " a mythological concept or character (including an astronomical object), a mineral, or similar substance, a place or geographical region, a property of the element, or a scientist," and must end in -ium. The petition tries to swing octarine as mythology, which is actually the same thing being tried for naming regions of Pluto. Not a very strong case, and the ending is definitely wrong.

hS

Reply Return to messages