Subject: My thoughts
Author:
Posted on: 2016-09-19 13:02:00 UTC

Over the last three years, I mentioned on several occasions that I’m not sure whether I actually want to write missions. Whenever this happened, somebody pointed out that I could write about the infrastructure departments, or write interludes for agents whose actual missions I just skip (apparently people want to see me write something). Doing this obviously still requires Permission, because the writing would be representing the PPC, but I don’t see why it would require the demonstrable ability to find missionable badfic and to explain why this badfic is sporkable. Maybe we shouldn’t make the stakes too high? On the other hand, applicants usually do want to write missions, so implementing a Restricted Permission to write everything PPC that isn’t a mission – that requires everything required for full Permission except choosing a badfic – would be ridiculous.

I don’t remember any Permission requests from the last three years where the badfic to be sporked was chosen from the Unclaimed Badfic list. Except my own, where I implied that this might be a reason to turn me down, but got Permission anyway. (I’m the biggest Mary Sue on the Board; everybody loves me and PGs go out of their way to fulfill my every whim :-) Actually, I just don’t like to actively search for badfic, and will probably always depend on others proposing badfic to spork. I don’t believe that this says anything about the ability – which I still have to demonstrate – to do the sporking. But the PGs may be justified in asking that the answer to 'and why you've chosen it' in such cases shows some own thoughts beyond copypasting the reasons given by the original proponent. (I, of course, would just have pointed to PC’s appropriate workshop, where I had already started to prepare for the mission.)

HG

Reply Return to messages