Subject: That's a spooky argument, right there.
Author:
Posted on: 2016-08-14 01:28:00 UTC

Right, so, your point (a very spooky point, indeed) is that magic can be considered a form of science, the application of which is then technology, in itself.

Comes down to the definition of magitek itself, then, whether it's magic comparable to technology, or (as I envision it) a marriage of naturalistic and magical principles, being a sort of sci-fi-fantasy horrific hybrid chimera monstrosity.

Tv Tropes notes that part of the nature of magitek is that magic is combined with something 'distinctively mechanical,' which, you could argue supports my definition, but, then again, Tv Tropes is always so terribly cloudy with all this stuff, I'm half expecting the site to collapse into raindrops.
I found another definition on some slang dictionary called Lingomash which says that magitek is 'any machinery that uses magic to function, or can manipulate magic,' but what the hell is Lingomash, right?
Machines are defined as 'an apparatus using mechanical power and having several parts, each with a definite function and together performing a particular task.' which certainly seems naturalistic to me.
Everything else just links over to Final Fantasy 6. Could find more, but I'm not writing a bloody essay over here, for heavens sake! Having a casual discussion over the internet!

So, then, my thoughts are, then, that a golem, composed of a statue driven by magic, lacks that mechanical/naturalistic part (statues being not particularly mechanical,) and is therefore just magic. Y'know, like wands, and enchanted swords, or magic rings.

My argument is filled with more holes than a beehive and I can't wait for it to be ripped apart.

Reply Return to messages