Subject: A response (with spoilers).
Author:
Posted on: 2012-11-16 00:24:00 UTC

Thank you for your review! I appreciate you taking the time to lay out your thoughts, not to mention find those goofs. Pointing out my errors, no matter how small, is never obnoxious. They've been fixed.

Acceptance was always intended to be the least emotionally troubling (you know, being 'Acceptance' and all). Having all five stories be unrelentingly depressing would be a bit much; there needs to be that breather at the end. And yes, Xericka did marry Gremlin. I left it unstated in part because I felt it was pretty obvious to anyone who's read my spin-offs, but mostly because I couldn't find a way to put it that didn't come off as awkwardly phrased.

Since Danny's death was such major focal point in Denial, I felt it should be important. An earlier draft sans the leap in front of the bullet just didn't sit right with me. Besides, sacrificing himself for Laura seemed like a very IC thing for Danny to do. I didn't dwell in-depth on the others' deaths because it wouldn't have fit well with what I was trying to do with these stories. The stories are all about those left behind and what they're going through, not necessarily about the moment of death.

One last thing I wanted to address, in regards to what you said about the PPC being "less humor-oriented and more realistic; of course, then it wouldn't quite be the PPC." One of the other reviews mentioned this as well. I always operated under the impression that the PPC was supposed to be somewhat realistic; having ordinary, relatable agents -- people we the audience are capable of relating to on a personal level -- opposing the over-the-top Sues and Stus. That's not to say it can't be funny, but being funny shouldn't be the only thing. You need calm moments where the agents can relate to each other beyond snarky one-liners.

I suppose I should also mention Crashing Down, which I would certainly not call a "humor-oriented" story.

Thank you again for the review. It was much appreciated.

Reply Return to messages