Subject: The crimes of Turin the Blacksword.
Author:
Posted on: 2017-10-21 07:13:00 UTC
-That he did take for himself Anglachel the cursed blade, and by its evil brought about many deaths.
-That he did flee the realm of Doriath to escape judgement, though he ought to have trusted in the wisdom of Thingol.
-That by so doing did he cause the departure of Morwen and Nienor from that same realm, and bring about their loss.
-That he did take up with outlaws, and condone the killing of innocents who happened upon their lair; and that by this course was Khim son of Mim slain, and emnity wrought which brought to pass his own betrayal.
-That he did alter the pattern of war waged by Nargothrond the Fair, betraying its location and bringing about its fall.
-That he did seek to contend with the Worm of Morgoth, becoming bewitched and seeking not to save Finduilas the Radiant from her fate.
-That he held his name as secret, depriving his ensorcelled sister of the chance to recover her mind.
-That he did slay Brandir the Blameless, prince of Brethil, for speaking only the truth.
Notably, I don't hold him responsible for the things he did: the death of Saeros, the killing of Beleg, and his marriage to Nienor. Those have the feel of fate about them, twisted by Morgoth. But the rest? That's Turin's own choices, and I hold him full guilty.
I really don't understand why Tolkien liked him so. He's not a hero, or even an antihero - just a blundering oaf with a talent for breaking things. Philosopher@Large once said that she wrote Beren by thinking 'what /wouldn't/ Turin do?', and I think that sums him up perfectly. (Fight me.)
As for noticing women... well, if he'd recognised that Nellas even /existed/, his whole story goes away, since she was the witness that could have exonerated him. But I'm not sure noticing Finduilas would have helped any. He still would have taken Nargothrond to war, and it was Glaurung's gaze that led him to ignore her, not his own disregard.
The Anfauglith: well, dunes can be of things other than sand. What's the difference between sand and dessicated soil anyway? I see Tolkien does use the word 'sand' itself, but I still don't think it's what we'd think of (golden beaches and red deserts).
You're right about 'dun-coloured', though. Hmm... Ard-Galen could have been reddish clay or something, or founded on sandstone; either would have allowed a tan-grey colour dust to form. Given the lack of rainfall out there, there's probably only a few designs that would let it grow anyway, I bet we could narrow it down.
/Or/, Tolkien wrote the Nirnaeth before he ever concieved of Ard Galen, and never changed the 'desert' to account for its history. Y'know. Just saying.
hS