Subject: doctorlit reviews Merry Wives of Windsor, Shakespeare
Author:
Posted on: 2019-04-02 02:16:00 UTC

Went for one of the less popular William Shakespeare plays this time. Sir John Falstaff had a minor appearance in the last Thursday Next novel I read, and the back cover blurb for the next one indicates that Merry Wives itself will be important to the plot. I’m debating whether I want to read through all the Henry plays as well before I continue with Thursday Next; I’ll admit I’m not too interested in the purely historical plays. I like my Shakespeare with a little fantasy.

Spoiler warning for The Merry Wives of Windsor.

It took me quite a while to really get into this play, partly because I had difficulty keeping track of the characters early on. This is probably my fault for, as I mentioned above, not reading the Henry plays first. (Also, my work schedule means I can typically only get reading done in fifteen-minute chunks separated by hours of work time during most of the week.) Either way, I did get into the play and its characters as time went on. I mean, its primary action is about a straight dude getting dumped on by everyone around him for being a horndog, so as an asexual person, it was hard not for me to be amused. I was cheering on the “merry wives” the whole time!

I was surprised at how modern this play felt to me. A lot of the humor—pratfalls, veiled pun-based insults, intentional and unintentional innuendo—are still hallmarks of modern humor, especially in film. In particular, the scene where Mistress Quickly keeps misinterpreting Sir Hugh’s innocent Latin as vulgar English, and the boy learning English is clearly more aware of the dual meanings than the grown Sir Hugh, felt like something out of a modern comedy.

It’s also interesting that the play, written so many centuries ago, very clearly puts female roles in the lead, while showing most of the main male roles to have character failings. We’re still struggling with presenting good female characters in fiction today, yet here’s Shakespeare back around 1600, making them the leads of a play, and the undeniable moral superiors of the story. The one thing Mistress Page is shown to get wrong is her plans for marrying her daughter off to Doctor Caius, but even then, it’s Anne Page’s desire to marry for love that’s cast as the correct decision; again, the smart decision comes from a woman. I also like that Fenton serves as a contrast to Falstaff by initially courting Anne for the same financial reasons as Falstaff was targeting Anne’s mother, but then got to know Anne and fell in true love.

—doctorlit, rooting for Anne to get paired with no one . . . but he guesses that’s just not in the cards, in this time period . . .

“Spoiler? I would I could wash myself of the spoiler. Spoiler, spoiler, spoiler! Ay, spoiler! I warrant you, spoiler, and of the season too, it shall appear.”

Reply Return to messages