Subject: Gilly, Gilly, Gilgamesh.
Author:
Posted on: 2018-10-15 11:49:00 UTC

I haven't read the particular translation you mention, but I own a different version, so here: talking!

The Epic of Gilgamesh is, to a modern reader, a deeply weird story, but it has resonances. If you're Judeo-Christian: remember how Genesis randomly includes stories like that of Onan (who was killed by God for doing sex wrong), or how Lamech just wanders up to his family and says, "You know how Cain was a murderer and God hated him? Yeah, I'm like that, only much worse", or how there are multiple scenes where some ostensibly sympathetic character gets blind drunk and people do stuff to them while they sleep (Noah and Lot spring to mind)? Or if you're not Christian: you know how Greek mythology has this endless litany of 'and then Zeus turned into a different animal which some girl happened to be really into and/or maybe it was rape, who knows'?

Yeah, Gilgamesh is like that. One of the opening scenes has the gods deciding that Gilgamesh needs a best bud to fight (so he'll stop ignoring his job), so they create a super hairy man named Enkidu. But, problem! Enkidu is quite happy to just chill out in the countryside, hanging with his wild animal besties.

Solution: a hunter who ran into Enkidu asks Gilgamesh if he can borrow a prostitute, then takes her and has her get naked to lure Enkidu away from the animals. After a literal week of constant boinking, Enkidu agrees to go over to Uruk and meet this Gilgamesh bloke. And Gilly and Enki fight, and then they kiss and make up, and then they go off to fight some monsters for kicks.

None of this is hyperbole or subtext; it's all right there on the tablets. It's all like that. Seriously. (Oh, and the prostitute is named 'Sham-hat', because history is awesome.)

The thing about Gilgamesh it's that it's a lot less refined than the Greek myths (or the Biblical ones). Homer, Hesiod, or Moses have a textual tradition behind them: they've been continually recorded, translated, and altered for thousands of years. Gilgamesh, in contrast, is known from original, 4000-year-old clay tablets. It's a record of a sprawling oral tradition at the time it was current. It's fireside stories told by a bunch of different people, all crammed together into an only crudely-joined narrative.

hS

Reply Return to messages