Subject: Well, yeah
Author:
Posted on: 2018-10-15 15:28:00 UTC

It is all of those things. As Mitchell notes (and this is fascinating, which is why I'm borrowing it), sex in this mythology isn't an act of savagery, or something sinister. Sex is noble, and a civilizing act.

It's also notable that that prostitute isn't really a prostitute: she's a priestess. Sexuality isn't just civilizing, it's actually holy.

And yeah, Gilgamesh is definitely less refined. The version I read was primarily based on the "standard version" which was a later Akkadian version. The earlier Babylonian versions are actually separate stories, and have their own mix of information that's a little different: namely, they're a lot more independent, being a chronicle of several stories rather than a single epic.

In that respect, they're comparable to the XIIth tablet of the standard version, which tells an entirely different story and actively contradicts the rest of the epic (Enkidu dies in a totally different way), and is primarily used as a device to explain the grim details of the underworld to the reader or listener.

Reply Return to messages