So far as I can see, there's no indication in Subforum View as to how many posts a thread has on it. You can see how many 'new' posts it has - though this seems to be calculated differently to how Aurora suggests the 'new' dot works (I think in Subforum view, it's 'posts in the last 24 hours'). You can also see whether the top post is the one bearing the tag (my last plug appears in Writing, because I tagged a couple of responses, but doesn't have a Writing tag, because the post itself was automatically generated), but nothing more than that.

If this section is supposed to imitate a view like this, then some indication as to whether you're looking at a single post with no replies, or a sprawling 120-piece conversation, would be useful I think?

hS

Since I'm RPing over on the T-Board and posting here, I've noticed T-Board has more tags, and they seem like good ones! Should we have the same set here?

~Neshomeh

I tried to post a short response just now and it said you can only post once a minute to avoid spam. I don't think this will really be a major problem, but it could be a bit of a pain occasionally.

I know, I know, daft question - but all except 2 posts on the Tarot thread have one, and they're dated to the 14th. They don't go away on refresh either (this is across both devices). Is it something like 'any post made more than 24 hours after the [thread/post] it's replying to', with no instruction to make it go away after another [24/48] hours has passed?

hS

This is a thing over on T-Board, too: the hat ( ^ ) character appears to cause whatever immediately follows it without a space to be written ^superscript , which is cool, but not a thing we need as often as we need an anime smiley face. There's always HTML for superscripts if we really want them. {= )

Also, speaking of T-Board, since this is up and running now, you might want to rename it to something other than PPC Posting Board if we're going to keep it as a separate RP location.

If not, how are RPs going to be handled here? Will threads with the RP tag and their replies not display in the main feed by default, perhaps?

~Neshomeh

As an accessibility issue, links in posts being distinguished solely by colour is less than great - particularly when that colour is red. I'm at the milder end of colourblind (red/green), and I'm still having trouble spotting them; someone with full colourblindness would be totally unable to see them.

hS

Okay, so on the webapps board, one really useful thing that I found was the 'return to messages' behaviour. What it did was, if you went back from an old message it would take you to the page in the archives where that message was stored, rather than the main page; it's kind of inconvenient if you end up back at the main page by accident while you're trying to read multiple discussions from 2011. Could you please implement 'smart return'?

Also, there seems to be an issue with image formatting in some posts (does the Board not react well to Photobucket?); when a post containing an image is expanded, the posts below it may not move properly, leading to a region of difficult-to-read overlapping text. An example of this can be found in this thread. This seems like it's probably a bug in something.

Other than that, I can't really think of any issues I've noticed since official deployment; the aesthetic is a lot nicer than the old Board, although it's a bit slower sometimes.

I think the NewBoard is still using the previous version of the header. I feel like we deliberately separated the Constitution out for emphasis; we also have a link to T-Board, which (assuming it's still going to be used for RP) should probably go in.

On the flip side, I should also update the Board header to prominently redirect people over here. It looks like we're coming down on the 'move immediately' side of things, so a visible link would be valuable.

hS

This search seems to show that it doesn't list results chronologically (in either direction), and also that searching in "quote marks" has no effect.

(I also note that the URL of that link has a tick mark in it - o.O is that safe?)

hS

This post, the archived version of your review to There Is Another, seems to have thrown a slight formatting glitch - the first dashed point has transformed into a bullet point, though none of the others have.

hS

I've had to sign up again - my T-Board login no longer existed - which is fine, but I figured I'd throw up a note.

I assume the 'Enable reply emails' checkbox is just for replies to this post?

hS