Subject: Should this case be considered a bad het, a Sue or a WhatThe? (nm)
Author:
Posted on: 2022-03-20 16:05:59 UTC
-
Er, a NSFW Toy Story badfic, anyone? Smauging Toy Story, man by
on 2022-03-15 15:12:10 UTC
Edited
Badfic report
Reply
This smutty reader x Woody should have been disturbing, and in some way it is, but in practice it just makes me burst out laughing at random intervals, both out of disbelief and the fact it's just that damn hilarious. None of this makes the fic any less NSFW however, so proceed with caution.
A quick summary: The fic is not a toy-as-humans AU, and neither is it stated that this is an owner-is-not-Andy AU, or whether the toys in this fic are the same ones as Andy's. In this short 3-chapter masterpiece, the female you-sue discovers that Woody the stuffed toy has somehow gotten an erection. Later that night, she has a dream in which Woody does… stuff to her. Note that it isn't stated he's grown to her size or she's shrunken to his size in this dream. In the second chapter, out-of-dream Woody becomes a jealous asshole and sends a threatening message to a guy you-sue has a crush on. She sleeps and dreams of him again, this time discovering that (dun dun DUN) she's inhabiting the body of her old Barbie doll, and the madness is too great I can't continue summarizing anymore. Just read this utter gem of a line coming from your favorite stuffed toy sheriff:
"Yep pretty much. I killed [Barbie] and used some forbidden magic or whatever to make it to where you can inhabit her body whenever you want!"
Now on a slightly unrelated note: since I have a fascination with minis, I feel compelled to ask what should Toy Story minis be? -
Tungsten-Tritium-Fluorine? by
on 2022-03-18 01:00:52 UTC
Edited
Reply
What sick creep would make a child's toy capable of that in the first place!?
-
Later in the fic, by
on 2022-03-18 02:43:34 UTC
Reply
Buzz seems to start having a thing for Woody as well. The fic hasn't continued past that point.
-
Hopefully the author thought better of this myxomatotic plot bunny. by
on 2022-03-19 01:35:30 UTC
Reply
It's already so far removed from sanity as to require mentally tough Agents to handle it without going flamethrower crazy.
-
Should this case be considered a bad het, a Sue or a WhatThe? (nm) by
on 2022-03-20 16:05:59 UTC
Reply
-
I'd go with WhatThe. (nm) by
on 2022-03-20 22:49:29 UTC
Reply
-
Yeah, the barbie thing pushes it over the edge. by
on 2022-03-20 23:37:41 UTC
Reply
Though, as ever, which department a mission gets sent to depends on what the mission writer wants to do. You can justify basically anything - if all else fails, someone in Intelligence clearly just messed up.
hS
-
Come to think of it, by
on 2022-03-21 08:09:31 UTC
Reply
That Encanto… thing probably qualifies as WhatThe too.
-
Ah, my forgetful little brain by
on 2022-03-21 14:28:37 UTC
Reply
I already said it was WhatThe-worthy in that thread 🤣
-
What, the Camilo/Mirabel one? by
on 2022-03-21 13:45:23 UTC
Reply
I forget if I ever said, but I actually looked at it. The writing is bloody awful, but there IS an explanation for the incest and resulting pregnancy: two adolescents who were never taught what sex is hanging out and discovering things that felt good together and only finding out the consequences when it was too late. It's actually pretty plausible. Research shows that comprehensive sex education correlates negatively with teen pregnancy. If you don't really understand what you're doing, what's to stop you from doing it?
That doesn't make the story good, but it does serve to show yet again that subject matter cannot be the sole determiner of quality, whether you like the subject matter or not.
~Neshomeh
P.S. Since the writing mechanics and style choices (if you can call them that) are the worst things about it, maybe it's a case for the DTE! It would be nice to see them again. {= D
-
Makes sense (nm) by
on 2022-03-21 14:29:21 UTC
Reply
-
I think the minis would be the little alien toys? by
on 2022-03-17 11:53:04 UTC
Reply
And aaaaasaaa the concept is just aaaaaaa!
-kA
-
(passes Bleeprin) (nm) by
on 2022-03-17 12:08:37 UTC
Reply