Subject: Ehhh.
Author:
Posted on: 2022-08-31 13:58:06 UTC

My concern is that trolling is a deliberate act of the author, whereas (say) writing bad slash is/could be unintentional while trying to write good slash. Any time you say a story is a troll, you are making a judgement call against the author.

If you say a story is a Suefic, you can point at specific evidence that proves the character meets the PPC's definition of a Suvian. If you say it is bad slash, or an implausible crossover, you can point at proof that it is a) slash/a crossover, and b) bad/implausible. If you say it is a troll, you can (usually) only point at evidence supporting that claim - not proving it.

As a concrete example: I'm positive this fic was a troll. But I, and Agent Kaitlyn, did not treat it as one, because there is no way to know for sure, and to say there is is to claim to know something about the author.

Sometimes - rarely - you do know. Maybe they post an entire chapter bragging about it. Maybe they're known for other trollfics. Maybe it shows up in the reviews, or in the story itself. So a Troll Division is reasonable and supportable. But I don't feel like there's enough out there to support a Department without causing issues.

As for a Division Head, I have no problem with that; there's enough of them around that, if you're actually writing for the division, you should be able to give it a leader.

(Usual disclaimer: hS is not the boss of you. His word has no more weight than anyone else's.)

hS

Reply Return to messages