Subject: On Intelligence and gadgets
Author:
Posted on: 2011-12-24 21:20:00 UTC
I am currently writing my introduction piece for my agent in DoI and I have (once again) a few questions to ask about background information.
Firstly, is Agent Bulldog is Architeuthis' property? He is implied to be the one in charge of newbie training so he is scheduled to make an appearance in my spinoff. I don't want to fudge up the disclaimer...
Secondly, I am considering introducing a new gadget for Intel operatives: the Dead Ringer from the Team Fortress 2 universe (more info here: http://wiki.teamfortress.com/wiki/Dead_Ringer). The function of this Spy watch is to drop a fake corpse and to cloak the user should he/she be harmed, allowing the Spy to make a quick getaway. This gadget would make it safer for spies disguised as an enemy to follow a Sue, as a Sue killing a canon enemy wouldn't arouse any suspicions.
For example, suppose a Spy in the Zeldaverse is disguised as a Moblin to follow a Sue. The Spy activates the Dead Ringer and then accidentally makes a loud noise. The Sue whips around and stabs the agent with a sword. The Spy is mostly shielded from the damage, rendered invisible for several seconds, and leaves a fake Moblin corpse impaled onto the Sue's sword. The Intel operative backs away to a safe location, uncloaks, and is able to continue his surveillance. May I introduce this to the PPC?
Lastly, I would also like to feature a variant on the Remote Activator. The current model is described as a metal stick having only three rings that can be rearranged to form up to 1000 combinations (10*10*10). I was thinking: how can 1000 combinations cover the entire multiverse and allow agents to portal to various locations inside the word world, let alone modify portal placement and size? My proposed variant would be almost identical in appearance to a graphing calculator, allowing agents to simply key in coordinates and modify portal properties with settings accessed by sub-menus.
I do feel rather apprehensive about this gadget though. After all, the RA is one of the PPC's signature technologies and I don't really want to impose too much of my own spinoff on other interpretations. Perhaps it can be part of a prototype test?