Subject: Further clarification
Author:
Posted on: 2011-11-14 03:23:00 UTC

My comment was on the original phrasing, and actually, PC, yours were quite different and addressed the issues concretely. I left me with a complete understanding of what you meant--and, in fact, ways to avoid what came up in Astral's mission.

The reason the original phrasing felt like an apology was because it showed, as ways to make a non-Sue, things that were done in Astral's mission that were leading into Sue territory. Because the comments were made with no knowledge of context? Taken in context it sounded like an excuse.

I would also like to point out that I said the check of dramatic scenes and powers was not infallible in either direction, whether to confirm either a Sue or a non-Sue.

Reply Return to messages