Subject: Question/Concern
Author:
Posted on: 2011-09-23 03:30:00 UTC

Okay, first things first. Writing prompts are always great to muck around with, and simultaneously reaffirming the bonds of the community after that recent rough patch is a very worthy goal. We need a good bit of healing. That being said:

For this month only, no concrit. Instead, choose another participant who you either don't know or have had differences with and tell them what's good about their story.

Part of the reason why I joined the PPC was because I felt confident that the community would not hold back when it came to constructive criticism. My reasoning was these were people who were passionate about encouraging good writing. These would be folks that would call me out when I wrote an overpowered character or strayed into the realm of cliche. In return, I would do my best to help them improve their writing in turn.

Saying only what you like about someone's story might be a nice ego booster, but it's not very useful in terms of improving one's writing. Personally, I try to do a mix of both in my peer reviews: starting out with the stuff I thought was great before moving on to the elements that need improvement.

Don't get me wrong. The prompt is great and the PPC community could use a bit of healing. But I don't like the idea of ignoring any negatives or downsides we might happen to run across just to make other people feel better. That's not why I joined.

Reply Return to messages