Subject: Il n'ya pas de quoi. (nm)
Author:
Posted on: 2013-05-26 21:06:00 UTC
-
A Question Regarding Sues by
on 2013-05-25 02:10:00 UTC
Reply
I personally don't think much of Mary Sue litmus tests, as they're more a list of common symptoms than an actual assessment of Sue-ishness. But I can't help noticing that one of the major ways to rack up some Sue points is to write an OC relating to canon characters.
I'm currently working on a fanfic for the Hobbit fandom, and my narrator Risa is, not very originally, the daughter of Thorin Oakenshield. I have tried very hard to keep her out of Sue territory, and she is deeply flawed in numerous ways, but I'm concerned that even just by being related to a central canon and by breaking the canon, she's already beyond hope of salvation.
Does breaking canon and being the child of an existing character make an OC a Sue? How can I be sure that she doesn't become one- other than piling on the flaws, which I don't think is particularly effective?
Thanks in advance!
-- Len -
Flaws =/= non-Sue. by
on 2013-05-25 05:24:00 UTC
Reply
"I have tried very hard to keep her out of Sue territory, and she is deeply flawed in numerous ways,"
More often than not, unless the flaws in question actually effect the character beyond giving them a shield against critics in the form of "Mary Sues are flawless, so my characters can't be Sues because they have flaws", it really only adds fuel to the Sue fire.
What works better is having the character discover these flaws as they go along. It's more realistic then, and gives a more human feel to the character - makes them relatable, if you will - and doesn't end up seeming like a preemptive defense against potential critics like the "Oh yeah, and I have such and such things wrong with me" approach does.
For my character Iris, terrible misfortune is her flaw, and it's because of one instance where she had the misfortune of running head-long into a dragon and all she had was a bow and a hunting knife. From there, it developed into the full symptom of not being able to do hardly anything without something bad happening to her, such as her boyfriend Drake chucking a pebble and knocking her out of a boat from the force of the throw. -
@SpectacularSC by
on 2013-05-25 13:13:00 UTC
Reply
Okay, let me rephrase that bit. What I meant to say but apparently only telepathically typed (I do this sometimes when it's late.) was that I realize Sues have less to do with the number of flaws than with the consequences of those flaws and how the plot and other characters bend around them, and so even though she is flawed, I am still concerned because of the canon-breaking and genetics, and am wondering if anyone has tips on how to write an AU and significant canon relative without turning it into a Suefic.
-
I've written fics where... by
on 2013-05-25 18:22:00 UTC
Reply
The main cast were directly, but indirectly (they were there but didn't do much) involved with the main plot, and were more for interaction with themselves, the main cast and other people.
I say this a good deal when I'm writing new material - it doesn't necessarily have to be a huge, overarching plot of good versus evil, that's just what sells for big bucks, and understandably so because people enjoy watching a moral smackdown. Good stories can also be written about simplistic things.
There was one I wrote, or tried to, a few years back that focused on a defecting soldier and his romance with an artist. The worst violence that ended up happening was the skirmish that he bolted from in the first chapter (but only because I ended up abandoning the story because I didn't know my materials all that well. I was twelve, keep in mind.)
I'm just saying, if you need to write an AU relationship without the Sued-effects (see what I did there?), you could just craft the plot around that primarily, and everything else as just a side plot for the sake of keeping with a specific timeline. -
Re: I've written fics where... by
on 2013-05-25 21:02:00 UTC
Reply
I've also worked on plots with a similar sort of idea.
That's not quite what I had in mind with this one (although the concept of more emphasis on the characters and less on the combat and salvation of the realm is the same basic mindset) but I definitely like the suggestion! At this point I think it would be easiest to swap out the setting and race, as the plot can probably stand just fine on its own without the quest. -
That's actually what I was getting at. by
on 2013-05-26 01:27:00 UTC
Reply
That was the idea I was trying to offer, so I consider this a job will done on my part.
-
In that case... by
on 2013-05-26 14:23:00 UTC
Reply
¡Dicho gracias más para tí, amigo!
-
Il n'ya pas de quoi. (nm) by
on 2013-05-26 21:06:00 UTC
Reply
-
Sorry for double post, hit reply early. by
on 2013-05-25 05:27:00 UTC
Reply
In conclusion, you can definitely place flaws on your character - goodness knows that Tolkien's characters are flawed, after all - just be sure to do it believably. Write the character as realistic to the setting as you can, don't just make her super great and then tack on downsides after the fact.
Hope this helps. -
@SpectacularSC by
on 2013-05-25 15:08:00 UTC
Reply
Thanks!
-
And I feel suddenly self-centered... by
on 2013-05-25 04:24:00 UTC
Reply
...because this immediately morphed into "A question regarding my character and plot."
*blushing*
...Or maybe I'm just exhausted... It would explain all these ellipses... The marks of a sluggish mind... -
Clarification by
on 2013-05-25 15:15:00 UTC
Reply
Since I suspect your feeling this way may be my fault. >.>;
Talking about writing questions that involve stuff you are working on is not bad at all! As you can see, many of us are happy to discuss all manner of fanfic- and writing-related topics. What I recently took issue with was a newbie starting multiple threads seemingly for the sole purpose of discussing their potential agent and refusing to drop it when asked, i.e. obsessing over Permission before it's even remotely appropriate. That's totally different from what you're doing here. {= )
To address the actual topic, I would just ask one semi-rhetorical question: Why is it important that the character be Thorin's daughter? And its semi-rhetorical corollary: Why can't the story be told any other way?
I say semi-rhetorical because I don't necessarily need to know the answers, and there aren't any guaranteed right answers. It's more of a "search your feelings: you know it to be Sue!" (or not-Sue, but that doesn't fit the quote) sort of deal.
~Neshomeh -
Actually... by
on 2013-05-25 16:11:00 UTC
Reply
Before I noticed your reply, I addressed this with a post aimed at another user, who had said that Dwarves were immune to disease, which is an absolute roadblock to the storyline, as it calls for an outbreak of septicemic plague. Which got me thinking that I either had to re-outline the second half of the fic or switch races- and thus, setting and family. Which in turn inspired me to wonder why it was even important that she be a Durin, and while I'm sure there was some reason those months ago when I dreamed up the idea... I can't for the life of me remember it.
So it's exactly what you said: I have no clue why it was important.
That clears up my issue, then, because by switching out her race for human, getting away from the canon relatives and the breaking of canon (by existing and by following the Company), I can now concentrate on the character herself. Focusing just on characterization should drastically decrease her chances of Suedom, and I won't have to fuss over the AU, since it won't be.
And the point of the story all along was the character development and the hardships each character has to go through, not the reclamation of Erebor, so changing the setting won't be a huge problem. -
Know what'd be cool? by
on 2013-05-25 19:05:00 UTC
Reply
Have her live in Lake Town during the quest. How does she react to Thorin and Co lording it over her people? Would she believe they are delusional, or con men (Dwarves?), or what?
Would she move to Dale with Bard after the battles? How does she react to her town being destroyed by Smaug? -
This is why Arda is so cool. by
on 2013-05-25 21:21:00 UTC
Reply
Unlike virtually any other canon I've read, there's just so much stuff - and all of it interconnected. For your idea, we know exactly how this character lived - how her home supported itself (trade with Mirkwood), what sort of perils they faced (mostly a certain dragon), the major trials (the Thorin Incident), and what ultimately happened to her (either died peacefully, or lived through/died in the Siege of Erebor during the War of the Ring).
And I love that... sense of world-out-there. The fact that, to take a random example, Shelob might once have spun her webs between Treebeard's herds - back when she was in Nan Dungortheb with the rest of Ungoliant's spawn, and he was:
To the pine-trees upon the highland of Dorthonion I climbed in the Winter.
Ah! the wind and the whiteness and the black branches of Winter on Orod-na-Thon!
My voice went up and sang in the sky...
It's just... connections all the way, back into the deeps of time (and where was Fangorn when Durin awoke for the first time in the forested heights of the Misty Mountains...?). Love it.
hS -
Re: A Question Regarding Sues by
on 2013-05-25 03:19:00 UTC
Reply
You are correct; Mary-Sue litmus tests tend to test for symptoms. This is because there is unfortunately no uniform definition for Mary-Sue across all of fandom, but we think we know it when we see it. However, I believe that if you can pass the PPC standard, you can pass anybody's standard (unless your critic is a purist who hates any OC, much less any female OC).
The PPC Wiki page on Mary Sues gives an adequate definition, but I highly prefer the one given by Neshomeh in a not-so-recent discussion: a Mary Sue
"A. does not behave like a believable-for-the-context person, B. does not get believable-for-the-context treatment from others, and C. is successful just because the plot says so."
That said, the mere existence of a relationship between your OC and Thorin Oakenshield is not, in and of itself, a sentence of Suedom. What is important is that the OC look like she belongs in Middle-earth. So, a few questions:
1) Did you explain how your OC could possibly be the daughter of Thorin Oakenshield? E.g., Does Thorin has so many children that your OC could presumably have been one of them (but was never centrally figured in the canon story), or are you just trying to shoehorn her into the Oakenshield family?
2) Does she act like a daughter of Thorin? Thorin being a dwarf king, does she act like a canonical Tolkien-verse dwarf princess would act? And if not, did you create a plausible reason why not?
The difference between a well-written OC and a Mary-Sue is not the mere presence or absence of faults; a Sue is a Sue because she warps canon. -
Well, it all depends on the circumstances. by
on 2013-05-25 03:03:00 UTC
Reply
A canon's-relative OC isn't necessarily doomed to become a Sue, but they would have a harsher start than most other OCs that just start out with tangential connections like being from the same clan or homeland as a canon character.
You'd need to adequately explain the canon character's past history in a way that allows for the character's presence without distorting the sequence of their past life enormously(assuming you aren't going for a full-on AU here, because those have different standards for what does and does not constitute acceptable changes to history), and you'd need to come up with a plausible reason why the OC would never have been mentioned by the canon in their journeys.
In Thorin's case, this would be especially tricky, since he's said to be among the last of his line of Dwarf Lords and there would probably be a big to-do about him having a child, but it's not impossible.
And it's not all about piling on flaws, even though giving a character flaws is a big part of making them seem realistic. It's about piling on what makes a character or circumstance interesting. Not what makes them "good", because there's a distinct difference there. I'd object to the term "piling on" as well, but I'm not going to start dissecting word choice here.
See, one of a Sue's main problems is that she forces the canon characters to feel bad for her, or love her, or be interested in her, but the readers are not. If a character is interesting and well-formed enough, a canon's reaction to their situation should be something that would be a logical reaction based on their character and how well they know the OC.
While a Sue would cause someone to fall in love with her or sympathize with her immediately just because she's "different" or some such, a more well-rounded OC would cause such matters to happen gradually, or at least logically, based on the characters she's affecting and their personalities. People don't get suspicious with Mary Sue, they don't get angry at Mary Sue unless it's set up to make her look better, and they don't ever second-guess her or make her pull her own weight. A well-rounded OC, on the other hand, should be susceptible to the same problems that a canon character in their situation would undergo, and would thus possibly have to deal with all of those.
I'd say the first of those three especially with a Thorin's-daughter OC. Where did she come from? the other dwarves would think. Why did Thorin never mention his past relationships? Does this mean he's got a lover somewhere? They'd see the strange occurrence as what it was, and react accordingly, and this would probably make your OC uneasy, and she would react. That might actually place seeds for a character arc for someone there.
In addition to what I said before, you need to make the events plausible within the world you created or are using, you need to have setup and buildup, and everything needs to lead together. If something starts happening seemingly "just because", you've got a problem. If reactions become overblown or too unrealistically subdued, that's another problem, etcetera etcetera. As long as you keep in mind what you want to do with the story and what to stay away from getting there to keep the characters from getting Sue-d, there's nothing keeping a canon's-duaghter OC from becoming a decent and well-rounded member of a cast of characters. -
@son of heaven176 and Outhra by
on 2013-05-25 04:05:00 UTC
Reply
Thanks for the advice!
As it so happens, the story does evolve into total AU, which is part of what worries me. Far as background goes, there weren't any particularly strange occurences. I did my best to keep it plausible, although it's certainly a breach of canon anyway. Through an arranged marriage, Thorin and a fairly well-respected dwarf maiden bore three children- one son and two daughters. He and his wife had a cordial, ordinary relationship until the Smaug incident. After the dwarves were driven out of Erebor, Thorin's wife and youngest daughter died of illness and starvation. His eldest son was killed during the struggle at Moria, leaving only the autistic middle child, Ri, who is the MC.
From there the story follows the plot of the book and movie, with added character development and, of course, the additional character herself. (She has mild separation anxiety and tried to follow the Company to the Shire.) However, at the audience with the goblin king things go horribly awry and after that it is almost entirely AU.
Also, I think it's worth noting that I did not, in fact, choose her family just to write about Fíli and Kíli, although they are influential in the story. Honestly, I have a soft spot for Bofur.
I guess I'm concerned about the cliché elements of the exposition and the major breaks of canon. I have never written an AU before, so this is a new experience for me, so if anyone is more seasoned in the art, I'd gladly listen to any suggestions.
This is quite the ramble. Apologies if it no longer makes sense. -
Ah, but... by
on 2013-05-25 08:59:00 UTC
Reply
It says here that Dwarf women marry once and for life or not at all, either because of their work, their fancied one already being taken, or their simple lack of desire to marry. That can be interpreted to say they have free will in spousal choice, so an arranged marriage seems a bit out of place. Personally, I think that free will is a huge deal amongst the Free Peoples of Middle-earth, and with that comes the ability to marry for love (for life).
True, since Thorin is Dwarvish royalty he could have been pressured somewhat to continue the family line, but could he not have found an eligible Dwarf lady on his own?
I mean, I'm not telling you to do anything, really; I'm just voicing my disagreement with placing an arranged marriage into a culture where an arranged marriage might not necessarily make sense. -
@Lily Winterwood by
on 2013-05-25 13:18:00 UTC
Reply
Ahh...
Did not know that.
Now that I think about it it does make sense. It wasn't brought up in the book, so I was ad libbing a bit with the marriage traditions, but you have a logical point there.
Luckily, it hasn't actually been brought up in the story yet, so I can tweak that a bit. Thanks!
*mad scribbling* -
Some quotes! by
on 2013-05-25 10:25:00 UTC
Reply
(I have always found the History of Middle-earth to be invaluable in writing stories)
"The Naugrim [Dwarves] were ever, as they still remain, short and squat in stature; they were deep-breasted, strong in the arm, and stout in the leg, and their beards were long. Indeed this strangeness they have that no Man or Elf has ever seen a beardless Dwarf - unless he were shaven in mockery, and would then be more like to die of shame than of many other hurts that to us would seem more deadly. For the Naugrim have beards from the beginning of their lives, male and female alike; nor indeed can their womenkind be discerned by those of other race, be it in feature or in gait or in voice, nor in any wise save this: that they go not to war, and seldom save at direst need issue from their deep bowers and halls. It is said, also, that their womenkind are few, and that save their kings and chieftains few Dwarves ever wed; wherefore their race multiplied slowly, and now is dwindling." (HoME XI, The War of the Jewels. These are described as being the words of Pengolod, an elf of Gondolin in the First Age. There's no indication that he'd actually met any Dwarves)
"In their own tongue the Dwarves name themselves Khazâd; and the Dark-elves called them the Naugrim, the stunted. Which name the exiled Noldor likewise took for them..." (Same source)
It should also be noted that the race of Dwarves descending from Durin are called the Longbeards, 'for their beards swept the floor before their feet'. None of the other races of the Dwarves are known to be extant in western Middle-earth, but they do exist. More specifically, the Firebeards and Broadbeams may be extinct, having lived in the mountains of Beleriand before it sank. The Ironfists and Stiffbeards, Blacklocks and Stonefoots awakened much further east. (Summarised from HoME XII: The Peoples of Middle-earth)
"Such dealings with their dead [burning the dead after the battle of Azanulbizar outside Moria] seemed grievous to the Dwarves, for it was against their use; but to make such tombs as they were accustomed to build (since they will lay their dead only in stone not in earth) would have taken many years. To fire therefore they turned, rather than leave their kin to beast or bird or carrion-orc. But those who fell in Azanulbizar were honoured in memory, and to this day a Dwarf will say proudly of one of his sires: 'he was a burned Dwarf', and that is enough." (Lord of the Rings: Appendix A - Part III. Irrelevant, but a nice bit of lore)
"They [the Dwarves of the Blue Mountains, ie Thorin's people] had very few women-folk. Dís Thráin's daughter was there. She was he mother of Fíli and Kíli, who were born in the Ered Luin. Thorin had no wife." (Same source)
"Dís was the daughter of Thráin II. She is the only dwarf-woman named in these histories. It was said by Gimli that there are few dwarf-women, probably no more than a third of their whole people. They seldom walk abroad except at great need. They are in voice and appearance, and in garb if they must go on a journey, so like to the dwarf-men that the eyes and ears of other peoples cannot tell them apart. This has given rise to the foolish opinion among Men that there are no dwarf-women, and that the Dwarves 'grow out of stone'.
"It is because of the fewness of women among them that the kind of the Dwarves increases slowly, and is in peril when they have no secure dwellings. For Dwarves take only one wife or husband each in their lives, and are jealous, as in all matters of their rights. The number of dwarf-men that marry is actually less than one-third. For not all the women take husbands; some desire one that they cannot get, and so will have no other. As for the men, very many also do not desire marriage, being engrossed in their crafts." (Same source again)
Also from Appendix A:III, the largest attested family size is three children: Thráin II's two sons (Thorin II Oakenshield, Frerin) and one daughter (Dís).
"They are a tough, thrawn race for the most part, secretive, laborious, retentive of the memory of injuries (and of benefits), lovers of stone, of gems, of things that take shape under the hands of craftsman rather than things that live by their own life. But they are not evil by nature, and few ever served the Enemy of free will, whatever the tales of Men may have alleged. For Men of old lusted after their wealth and the work of their hands, and there has been enmity between the races." (LotR: Appendix F)
"Dwarves of different 'breeds' vary in their longevity. Durin's race were originally long-lived (especially those named Durin), but like most other peoples they had become less so during the Third Age. Their average age (unless they met a violent death) was about 250 years, which they seldom fell far short of, but could occasionally far exceed (up to 300). A Dwarf of 300 was about as rare and aged as a Man of 100.
"Dwarves remained young - e.g. regarded as too tender for really hard work or for fighting - until they were 30 or nearly that (Dáin II was very young in 2799 (32) and his slaying of Azog was a great feat). After that they hardened and took on the appearance of age (by human standards) very quickly. By forty all Dwarves looked much alike in age, until they reached what they regarded as old age, about 240. They then began to age and wrinkle and go white quickly (baldness being unknown among them), unles they were going to be long-lived, in which case the process was delayed. Almost the only physical disorder they suffered from (they were singularly immune from diseases such as affected Men, and Halflings) was corpulence. If in prosperous circumstances, many grew very fat at or before 200, and could not do much (save eat) afterwards. Otherwise 'old age' lasted not much more than ten years, and from say 40 or a little before to near 240 (two hundred years) the capacity for toil (and for fighting) of most Dwarves was equally great." (HoME XII: The Peoples of Middle-earth - 'The Making of Appendix A')
"It is then said that Dwarves marry late, seldom before they are ninety or more, they they have few children (so many as four being rare), and continues:
"To these they are devoted, often rather fiercely: that is, they may treat them with apparent harshness (especially in the desire to ensure that they shall grow up tough, hardy, unyielding), but they defend them with all their power, and resent injuries to them even more than to themselves. The same is true of the attitude of children to parents. For an injury to the father a Dwarf may spend a life-time in achieving revenge. Since the 'kings' or heads of lines are regarded as 'parents' of the whole group, it will be understood how it was that the whole of Durin's Race gathered and marshalled itself to avenge Thrór.
"Finally there is a note on the absence of record concerning the women of the Dwarves:
"They are seldom named in genealogies. They join their husbands' families. But if a son is seen to be 110 or so years younger than his father, this usually indicates an elder daughter. Thorin's sister Dís is named simply because of the gallant death of her sons Fili and Kili in defence of Thorin II. The sentiment of affection for sister's children was strong among all peoples of the Third Age, but less so among Dwarves than Men or Elves among whom it was strongest." (Same source. Italics indicate a comment or summary by Christopher Tolkien)
"Baruk Khazâd! Khazâd ai-mênu!"
hS -
I'm guessing that that line at the end is Dwarvish... by
on 2013-05-26 04:49:00 UTC
Reply
but being that I (and most PPCers, unless I am mistaken) are not fluent in the Tolkien languages, could you please provide a translation?
-
If I remember correctly... by
on 2013-05-26 05:22:00 UTC
Reply
Khazâd = Dwarves, so it's something like "The axes of the Dwarves! The Dwarves are upon you!" Unless I've got it backwards, or I'm confusing it with another battle-cry. Or I'm completely wrong.
But really, only Dwarves are fluent in Dwarvish. They're very secretive about their language; even the names we know for them aren't the ones they use amongst themselves.
~Neshomeh -
That's the one. by
on 2013-05-26 08:36:00 UTC
Reply
"Yet in secret (a secret which unlike the Elves, they did not willingly unlock, even to their friends) they used their own strange tongue, changed little by the years; for it had become a tongue of lore rather than a cradle-speech, and they tended it and guarded it as a treasure of the past. Few of other race have succeeded in learning it. In this history it appears only in such place-names as Gimli revealed to his companions; and in the battle-cry which he uttered in the siege of the Hornburg. That at least was not secret, and had been heard on many a field since the world was young. Baruk Khazâd! Khazâd ai-mênu! 'Axes of the Dwarves! The Dwarves are upon you!'" (Appendix F again)
hS -
A Revelation by
on 2013-05-25 15:57:00 UTC
Reply
...and they have already proved it.
My plot calls for an outbreak of septicemic plague later on, and although I was aware that Dwarves' immune systems were unusually strong, being impervious to disease... won't work.
Thanks for calling this to my attention!
I outlined the story months and months ago, and while I'm sure there was some logical reason for the character being a Dwarf of that family... I can't remember it.
So it should be relatively easy to switch out the setting and race- simpler than rewriting the second half of the plot, anyway.
That should also clear up any misgivings about the canon relatives, breaking canon (which can now co-exist with the fanfic), and Dwarvish customs, so I can focus on the character herself, which is much more managable and less likely to veer into Suedom.
Thank you again! -
You're welcome. by
on 2013-05-25 21:12:00 UTC
Reply
Something I would like to see someone do - I may end up doing it myself - is writing a completely canon-friendly story of a Dwarven woman. It would probably be set during the First Age, when the Dwarves of Belegost and Nogrod had traffic with those of Khazad-Dum - and with the other two-or-four realms far to the east.
In fact, if I were writing it, I think it would be the tale of the fall of Gundabad - awakening-place of Durin, central meeting place of all seven races - to the Orcs... hmm. Plot-Nuzgul are dangerous things...
hS -
Is that a mini-Balrog I spot? by
on 2013-05-26 00:01:00 UTC
Reply
"Nuzgul" does not look like any Tolkienverse name I know. The closest I know is "Nazgûl."
-
Nuzgul are from OFUM. by
on 2013-05-26 03:50:00 UTC
Reply
They were rabbitlike creatures, born of a typo of some sort, like the Fodfather from HFA.
Plot-bunnies+Arda+PPC=Plot-Nuzgul. Though I can see where your assumption was coming from. -
Ah, thank you. by
on 2013-05-25 15:25:00 UTC
Reply
And that, I think, is why beardless Dwarves ought to be a charge.
-
Unless, of course... by
on 2013-05-25 18:49:00 UTC
Reply
Maybe, instead of being a beardless Dwarf, or something to that effect, the character could have shaved his/her beard out of deep (really deep) shame or the extreme need to go into hiding.
Maybe the character was taken prisoner and shaving facial hair was a necessity in prison. I dunno.
But, whatever the cause, a beardless Dwarf would have deep emotional scars, which, handled properly, would make for a great character. (Now theres an idea...)
Not sure why I said all that. Probably just a need to let off some hot air. -
Sues rarely take that into consideration. by
on 2013-05-25 18:51:00 UTC
Reply
Ergo if a Dwarf Sue lacks a beard and the requisite shame for lacking a beard, it would be a charge.
-
...You lost me there. :P (nm) by
on 2013-05-25 21:04:00 UTC
Reply
-
Dwarf Sues are a thing, I swear. by
on 2013-05-25 21:43:00 UTC
Reply
And there are an alarming number of beardless Dwarf Sues on the Pit (and presumably in the Circle, but I don't dare take a look in there). Since it's mentioned earlier that a Dwarf's beard is their pride and joy and that cutting or shaving it would be shameful to them, naturally a beardless Dwarf would feel great shame in a lack of beard.
However, many of these beardless Dwarf Sues seem to take their beardlessness as a sign of beauty. Yeah. Doesn't compute. -
I'm not sure we can even blame the movie for lack of beards. by
on 2013-05-27 12:13:00 UTC
Reply
Er, not that you mentioned it, but I thought I'd bring it up.
I don't know if it actually made the movie, but if you do a google search, you get pictures of female Dwarves who...well, they do have beards. Just...very thin ones. But the beards are there! So the Sues have no excuse: they should either have full beards and be unrecognizable as being different from male Dwarves, or they should have thin beards and...well, they should have thin beards at the very least, let's leave it at that.
Although, again, I'm not sure if that even ended up in the movie. It could just be promotional stuff.
~DF -
Yeah, no, the Dwarf females have beards in the film. by
on 2013-05-27 18:11:00 UTC
Reply
They were spotted at the beginning of the film, when the Dwarves were first exiled from Erebor.
-
Proper beards? by
on 2013-05-27 18:23:00 UTC
Reply
Also, boo, Sues. You literally have no excuse whatsoever. Er, unless you haven't seen the movies or read the books, in which case, why are you writing fanfic of them??
~DF -
Where does Tolkien address the whole beard thing? by
on 2013-05-26 20:13:00 UTC
Reply
Just out of curiosity from how people've talked in this thread.
-
Right over yonder. by
on 2013-05-26 20:47:00 UTC
Reply
http://disc.yourwebapps.com/discussion.cgi?disc=199610;article=244066;title=PPC%20Posting%20Board
In which hS quotes bunches of Tolkien. -
I swear I'm not as dumb as this makes me look. (nm) by
on 2013-05-26 20:49:00 UTC
Reply
-
A classic case... by
on 2013-05-25 22:53:00 UTC
Reply
Of the Suethor applying modern cultural standards to a fictional culture. I recently read a Star Trek Suefic where the Sue complained that she had purple eyes. Because in the 24th century, non-humans are totally rare and never join Starfleet.
Blame Thorin and Fili and Kili. They made dwarves look attractive. I maintain that Sues decide to be the prettiest looking race. -
I submit this short mockery for your approval/amusement. by
on 2013-05-27 12:31:00 UTC
Reply
(for reference, this is AOS. Even though you've said it was the 24th century. Hope it's still funny...)
"Oh woe is me, for my eyes are a depressing shade of violet!" the woman wailed.
Jim Kirk gave her an odd look. "Uh, right. I'll just be over here, okay?" He turned and quickly walked over to the nearest crewmember on the bridge. "Uhura, help!" he hissed. "She's at it again."
The Communications officer rolled her eyes. "Is it the red-and-blue hair this time, or the purple eyes?"
"The eyes," Kirk replied, glancing back at the Cardassian Ambassador's aide. "I don't get why she thinks they're so unusual, we were just on a planet where everyone had them--shit, she's coming over here!"
"How couldst thou ever love one such as me?" the woman in question cried. A single tear slid down her cheek. "For I have amethyst eyes and glittery skin and crimson-and-cobalt hair--"
"Spock!" Kirk called. "Put that picture on the viewscreen, will you?"
Spock complied, and Kirk turned the woman to face the viewscreen.
"Look," he said. "See those people?"
The woman gasped. "But--but--"
"They look exactly like you," Kirk said. "Uh, except for the skin, but that's probably added--uh--right. Look, we were just on a planet where everyone had that coloring. So you can stop whining about it, and maybe even, I don't know, do your job." He let her go, and walked down to the Captain's chair.
The woman stood frozen for a short five minutes, during which the bridge operated normally (with perhaps a few added snickers). Then, the relative silence was broken.
"Woe is me," the woman wailed, "for I have naturally shimmering skin! How couldst thou ever--"
"Please get off the bri--"
"--love one cursed--"
"Get off the bridge!"
"--with such an afflic--" The woman's voice stopped mid-sentence, and most of the bridge crew breathed sighs of relief.
Kirk grinned. "I knew there was a reason I keep you around," he said to Spock.
The Science officer raised an eyebrow. "I was merely removing a disruption," he said calmly.
"Pay up," Sulu whispered to Chekov, and the Navigator complied.
"I cannot believe ze keptin did not crack first!" Chekov muttered.
Uhura took one more look at the unconscious woman lying abandoned on the floor, and turned back to her station, smiling.
--
I really need to see the new movie. I've missed these guys a lot.
~DF -
*laughter* by
on 2013-05-27 19:07:00 UTC
Reply
I imagine TOS characters to be particularly used to Sues, and therefore expert at dealing with them. What makes this particularly amusing, though, is that this is the segment of fic I was complaining about:
Two things were off about my appearance, my eyes were completely purple, everything expect my pupils was a bright purple, and my wildly curly black hair naturally had random streaks of brown, blue, green and bright red.
It's like you knew that she also had colorful hair.
You haven't seen Into Darkness yet? You poor unfortunate soul. Go. You must. It is awesome. -
*bows* by
on 2013-05-27 19:39:00 UTC
Reply
Whoa, wait, she has no whites? Weird. But still, not very strange for an alien.
Heh, I see everything. /is bricked/ Well, no, I don't. It was a lucky guess. And I think I needed something to add, because just having purple eyes is kind of random.
I'd have to go to a lot of trouble to see it in theaters--I'm currently kind of far away from places that have them--but I'll catch it online at some point. Probably soon, since I'm starting to get mild spoilers and I want to join in with the Board discussion...
~DF -
Ugh, why. by
on 2013-05-25 22:58:00 UTC
Reply
Western ideals of hairless beauty do NOT belong with the Dwarves for Glaurung's sake. I've ranted about this on Tumblr many, many times.
But Thorin and Fili had beards. Kili just had some stubble. Dammit Kili. -
movie!Kili looks like movie!Aragorn. by
on 2013-05-27 12:14:00 UTC
Reply
To me, anyway. Perhaps they're related? /bricked
~DF -
Shoot me now. (nm) by
on 2013-05-26 00:34:00 UTC
Reply
-
@Huinesoron by
on 2013-05-25 13:35:00 UTC
Reply
Thank you! I'm sure these will be most helpful.
-
^That was my post. Just so you know. (nm) by
on 2013-05-25 16:22:00 UTC
Reply