Subject: You pack a lot of stuff into 6 chapters.
Author:
Posted on: 2011-08-21 13:52:00 UTC

A lot of uncanon stuff. Like, think about everything I wrote about it in an earlier post. That's pretty much a full charge list.

Actually, I find 4-6 chapters the optimal sporking length. Any longer, and it gets too long to cover ALL of the story... I end up skipping over narrative so the context is lost a little, and spending valuable time in a story to explain just why X and Y is bad is a bit taxing on the flow and pacing of it.

I actually might not even wait until chapter 6 to kill it.

... writer's block? Well, I'm not going to say DON'T write this story more, but we both know it's not really doing any special favors for the Mario section on ff.net. Actually, in reading this over to spork, I do see some good potential in your writing, if the un-canon-ness and the multiple-speakers-per-paragraph were squared out. The main character, Gary Stu background aside, is actually not that bad in ATTITUDE and would make a decent humor self-insert character.

(Half of being a Mary Sue/Gary Stu in my opinion is unrealistic treatment of setting and characters, which he's got in spades. The other half is the attitude of entitlement/nullifying all character traits save the ones that get the Sue/Stu what she/he wants. This particular selfinsert Stu doesn't have as much of the second one. Take away all of the Stu's 'stuff' and his glitter level is greatly reduced.)

Most of the time when go around reading marginal stories and looking for sporking material, something I see even more than the 'why this story breaks the canon' is 'how this story and writer can improve,' Sometimes it's very depressing because I'm not going to be able to speak to the writer of the badfic in question, and leaving a review is ignored a lot of the time. Sporking this fic is actually a change of pace for me because while it's bad, it has that one redeeming quality (the lead if reimagined and brought down to normal could be funny!) that indicates that with practice, the writer could write something palatable pretty easily. Usually I try and aim for the worst of the worst for fic that has no redeeming qualities because it's distracting to think about how a fic might be better when I'm supposed to be discussing why a fic is the worst.

Reply Return to messages