Subject: two camps
Author:
Posted on: 2011-07-29 08:41:00 UTC

There seem to be two camps on the disclaimer front: those who think it's absolutely necessary, and those who think it is rubbish. I'm closer to the latter camp. I seriously doubt a disclaimer is going to give you any kind of legal protection. When the rights owners want to sue, they sue, regardless of whether you have put up a disclaimer stating you don't own the stuff. They're very real (and legally sound) argument will be: well, if you don't own it, why are you putting it up on the Internet?

Acknowledging the original author can be done in the author's note. It doesn't need to have the rather meaningless word "disclaimer" tacked to it.

----

As for the misspelt town. Wouldn't that be just another mini (or other beasty) rather than an uncanonical town?

I've missioned two fics where the author consistently misspelt one of the characters' names and wrote them OOC to boot. But in neither case did I treat this character as an OC or character replacement.

On the other hand, burning down a town is probably more fun. Just, charging with creating an uncanonical town implies that the canonical town is still around somewhere.

Reply Return to messages